So why SBS?
- From: "Jonathan Davey" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:39:41 -0000
Now that Ive implemented SBS, I cant actually see what benefits it brings
over and above SharePoint for SMB
1) Exchange is weird and unfamilar, theres plenty of significantly better
freeware options available!
1b) Sharepoint provides "public" folders in much the same way as Exchange,
but significantly simpler and usable.
2) Domain, err still dont see the point. For example as a test Ive added a
dummy PC to the network, it does not have any user/device authentication
within SBS but its network places are populated with server/shares!! AND I
can add and delete any files from UserFolders. Get real!!
3) Backup, migrate, swing, nightmare with blob files. NO NO NO!
Simple file share, simple backup, 5mins fallover recovery.
4) RAS, VPN.... Why bother?? Sharepoint provides depositry of files,
security job done!
5) Sharepoint doesnt require you to employ a person simply to administer
CALs, (yes theres actually a user profile for CAL management!)
I like SBS but have difficulty with the correlation between ease/cost of
deployment and benefits.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: So why SBS?
- From: Leonid S. Knyshov
- Re: So why SBS?
- From: Alan
- Re: So why SBS?
- From: David Parkes
- Re: So why SBS?
- From: Time Traveller
- Re: So why SBS?
- Prev by Date: RE: BCM, Outlook 2003, and Exchange SBS 2003 will not co-operate
- Next by Date: Re: Remove Folder Redirection
- Previous by thread: RE: BCM, Outlook 2003, and Exchange SBS 2003 will not co-operate
- Next by thread: Re: So why SBS?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading