RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS
- From: v-yanniw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("Jenny wu [MSFT]")
- Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:48:26 GMT
Hi,
Thanks for posting here.
I am sorry for not very clear know what is the concern you have. Can you
describe me more detail? If you have some concerns about the Microsoft
Defragmenter utilities, you can try to use some third party tools to see if
it helps.
Third-party disk defragmenter tools for Windows Server 2003, Windows XP,
and Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;130539
I am happy to be of assistance to you!
Have a nice day!
Sincerely,
Jenny Wu
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
======================================================
PLEASE NOTE the newsgroup SECURE CODE and PASSWORD will be updated at 9:00
AM PST, February 14, 2006. Please complete a re-registration process by
entering the secure code mmpng2006 when prompted. Once you have entered the
secure code mmpng2006, you will be able to update your profile and access
the partner newsgroups.
======================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from this issue.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
======================================================
--------------------
Thread-Topic: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS<XU2pEsm7FHA.832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thread-index: AcYsbvPkIEQSrkpFQuuGSN4QJ1UpEw==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 71.38.215.115
From: "=?Utf-8?B?VEQ=?=" <TD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AAFE59DE-8364-4D58-8AA5-08D8CCC04472@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<636A8CA8-3D52-41B4-A183-9D1E572E0EAE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<WyY2aLD8FHA.4000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBSIs
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:17:27 -0800
Lines: 319
Message-ID: <7506BBE2-F76C-47CE-AFE8-097617A46FC3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:242881
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
I've noticed that drives in SBS 03 get fragmented quickly and severely.
there anything we can do to keep the systems from getting so fragmented?mirrored
Typically, I run SBS with 3 drives - a system drive, which contains SBS
including Exchange, etc, and a data drive - containing user data -
to the third drive.total
I'm using Adaptec 29160 SCSI adapter and 72GB 10kRPM SCSI drives. For
instance, I just defragged a client's drives - C drive (system) had 52%
fragmentation, E drive (data) was better with "only" 30% fragmentation.you
(pretty high in my book).
Thx,
--
TD ABQ, NM
""Jenny wu [MSFT]"" wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your update!
Regarding to the disk defragmenter analyze report, it is normal. Yes,
correspondingare right. We need use the exeutil tool to reduce the Exchange database
size. You can refer to the following KB articles for detail steps:
328804 How to Defragment Exchange Databases
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=328804
192185 XADM: How to Defragment with the Eseutil Utility (Eseutil.exe)
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=192185
If you have any further question on the issue please let me know. I am
happy to be assistance of you and look forward to your update!
Have a nice day!
Sincerely,
Jenny Wu
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues
regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the
manner.newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely
theYou can locate the newsgroup here:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check
are"Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there
newsreader,any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your
doingplease "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your
issue.
Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we
provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In
Pleaseso, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly.
rights.check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
professionals
--------------------
Thread-Topic: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS<XU2pEsm7FHA.832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
thread-index: AcXvdHBqVTD2GsJmQkOvAxDmSGIfTg==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 66.147.52.242
From: "=?Utf-8?B?TWlrZQ==?=" <Mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AAFE59DE-8364-4D58-8AA5-08D8CCC04472@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBSfiles
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:53:03 -0800
Lines: 239
Message-ID: <636A8CA8-3D52-41B4-A183-9D1E572E0EAE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:224612
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
Jenny,
Thank you for your reply.
After using Window's Disk Defragment, I print a report that describes
that could not be defragmented. Following are some of the details:that
Volume Size = 14.65GB
Cluster Size = 4 KB
Percent Free Space = 25%
Total Fragmentation = 17%
File Fragmentation = 34%
Total Fragmented files = 6
Pagefile fragments = 1
Fragmented folders = 1
Total MFT Fragments = 2
Files that could not be defragmented:
\WINNT\SchCache\(FQDN) 19 fragments, 974KB
\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\priv1.stm 182 fragments, 740MB
\Program Files\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA\priv1.edg 264 fragments, 953MB
Please advise your recommendations; should I run the tool for Exchange
defragmenter?
""Jenny wu [MSFT]"" wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for using the SBS newsgroup!
I am sorry for the delayed response due to weekend. Please understand
the newsgroups are staffed weekdays by Microsoft Support
pleaseto
Diskanswer your systems and applications questions. Your understanding is
greatly appreciated!
For your description, I understand that you have some concern on the
Defragmenter tool of the SBS 2003 server box. If I am off base,
todon't hesitate to let me know.
You need not process defragmenting under safe mode.
Before we go further, please kindly help me collect some information
processedisolate the issue:
I. How you know the C: drive is horribly fragmented even after
includedDiskeeperdefragmenting?
The Disk Defragmenter tool is based on the full retail version of
by Executive Software International, Inc. The version that is
FAT,with
Microsoft Windows 2000 and later provides limited functionality in
maintaining disk performance by defragmenting volumes that use the
athe
FAT32, or the NTFS file system.
This version has the following limitations:
a). It can defragment only local volumes.
b). It can defragment only one volume at a time.
c). It cannot defragment one volume while scanning another.
d). It cannot be scheduled.
e). It can run only one Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in at
4time.
f). It cannot defragment NTFS volumes with cluster sizes larger then
Diskkilobytes (KB) in Windows 2000.This limitation has been removed for
2003.Defragmenter in Microsoft Windows XP and Microsoft Windows Server
possibleg). Fine-grained movement of uncompressed NTFS file data is not
ofin
Windows 2000. Moving a single file cluster also moves the 4-KB part
asthe
Diskfile that contains the cluster. This limitation has been removed for
Defragmenter in Windows XP and later.
h). In Windows 2000, it does not defragment NTFS metadata files, such
Itdirectory'sthe Master File Table (MFT), or the metadata that describes a
contents. This limitation has been removed in Windows XP and later.
hascannot defragment encrypted files in Windows 2000. This limitation
article:been
removed in Windows XP and later.
For more detail information, you could refer to the following KB
Windows
Disk Defragmenter Limitations in Windows 2000, Windows XP, and
XP,tryServer 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;227463
II. And also I suggest you take a look at the following KB article to
some third-party disk defragmenter tools to test.
Third-party disk defragmenter tools for Windows Server 2003, Windows
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/TechRand Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;130539
How Disk Defragmenter Works
defragef/58b410b9-8de8-459b-a43d-ddebb5ec3398.mspx
III. It is recommended that you use the "Eseutil /d" command to
sizethe
Exchange 2003 server databases. When the users delete messages, the
databaseof
the database will keep the same and you must perform an offline
defragmentation using the exeutil tool to reduce the Exchange
canspaceseize. Please note that defragmenting a database requires free disk
processequal to 110 percent of the size of the database that you want to
so if you do not have enough free space to run the eseutil tool, you
->temporarydefrag the database on another computer. See:
328804 How to Defragment Exchange Databases
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=328804
192185 XADM: How to Defragment with the Eseutil Utility (Eseutil.exe)
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=192185
IV. What is more, you can use the Disk Cleanup tool to delete all
files. You can launch the tool from Start -> Programs -> Accessories
theSystem Tools -> Disk Cleanup. For more information, you can refer to
built-inpurgefollowing KB article which also applies to Windows 2000:
310312 Description of the Disk Cleanup Tool in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=310312
V. Perform an online backup of the Exchange 2003 Information Store to
the transaction log files. You can use either the Windows 2003
PracticesNTBackupNTBackup tool or an Exchange-aware third party backup tool. To use
Windowsto backup Exchange information store, you can refer to the following
Microsoft KB article:
258243 How to Back Up and Restore an Exchange Computer by Using the
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=258243
VI. I would like to give your some information about some Best
happens.numberexperience for defragment:
- Analyzing after large numbers of files are added
Volumes might become excessively fragmented when users add a large
of files or folders, so be sure to analyze volumes after this
freeoftenGenerally, volumes on busy file servers should be defragmented more
spacethan those on single-user workstations.
- Ensure that your disk has at least 15% free space
A volume must have at least 15% free space for Disk Defragmenter to
completely and adequately defragment it. Disk Defragmenter uses this
as a sorting area for file fragments. If a volume has less than 15%
increasespace, Disk Defragmenter will only partially defragment it. To
onthe
disk.free space on a volume, delete unneeded files or move them to another
minimize
- Defragmenting during low-usage periods
Defragment file server volumes during low-volume usage periods to
performance.the effect that the defragmentation process has on file server
The time that Disk Defragmenter takes to defragment a volume depends
filesseveral factors, including the size of the volume, the number of
issueson
resources.the volume, the number of fragmented files, and available system
upgrade
- Defragmenting after installing software or installing Windows
Defragment volumes after installing software or after performing an
bestor clean install of Windows. Volumes often become fragmented after
installing software, so running Disk Defragmenter helps to ensure the
lookfile system performance.
Hope above information helps! I am happy to be assistance of you and
forward to your reply!
Have a nice day!
Sincerely,
Jenny Wu
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have
checkcorrespondingregarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the
manner.newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely
You can locate the newsgroup here:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you
yourthe
are"Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there
newsreader,any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your
please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from
weissue.
Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although
doingprovide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In
Pleaseso, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly.
check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS
- From: TD
- RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS
- References:
- RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS
- From: TD
- RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS
- Prev by Date: Client computer that can't access companyweb or other sharepoint websites
- Next by Date: Re: ConnectComputer vs. Assign Apps
- Previous by thread: RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS
- Next by thread: RE: Defragmenting Windows 2003 SBS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|