Re: what to do with local and remote users for a SBS Network?
- From: "Bill Sanderson" <Bill_Sanderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:08:33 -0500
I've asked about CALs in a separate message--but this thread involves
scenarios much like one that I am migrating from sbs-2000 to sbs-2003, and I
need to pick between User and Device cals.
My inclination is to go with User cals--but I'd love to hear whether anyone
in this thread has a rule of thumb that they use for thinking about this
issue.
I'm seeing increasing remote usage, and portable devices, and thinking that
User makes more sense than Device, given that trend.
--
"Leythos" <void@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NTAyf.14739$PY6.2733@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <O6cy0diGGHA.1124@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> mwport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>> Exchange mail is doable with either POP3 Connector or a 3rd party POP3
>> hoster (in combination with the POP3 Connector) and a free DDNS account.
>> I
>> use this setup at several sites and it works well.
>>
>> The bigger issue is with User1. Given the security problems with offsite
>> laptops (theft of the laptop, data confidentiality, HIPAA requirements,
>> or
>> company policy regarding data security), almost all of User1's
>> requirements
>> could be met with RWW and without a VPN. Even if he were in the office
>> and
>> decided to use his laptop, he could RWW (or RDP) into his desktop.
>> Everything then stays on his desktop or the SBS server at the office.
>> The
>> only time it would be a problem is if he absolutely needed (and was
>> allowed)
>> access to company data files when he did not have a suitable Internet
>> connection available.
>
> Yea, in the case of Medical I can see the concern, but this client is a
> realestate office and the User1 is in/out 50/50 and has to have their
> files at both locations.
>
> I also have to apply this type of scenario to small offices that have
> already (before my involvement) purchase 2003 Standard, not SBS2003
> Standard.... Being able to apply a single solution makes it easier to
> manage, but the SBS platform has it all hands down :)
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
> spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx
> remove 999 in order to email me
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what to do with local and remote users for a SBS Network?
- From: Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]
- Re: what to do with local and remote users for a SBS Network?
- References:
- Re: what to do with local and remote users for a SBS Network?
- From: Frank McCallister SBS MVP
- Re: what to do with local and remote users for a SBS Network?
- From: Merv Porter [SBS-MVP]
- Re: what to do with local and remote users for a SBS Network?
- Prev by Date: RE: Public IP becomes unpingable after time
- Next by Date: Re: Slow DSL Connection SBS2003
- Previous by thread: Re: what to do with local and remote users for a SBS Network?
- Next by thread: Re: what to do with local and remote users for a SBS Network?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|