Re: Symantec vs. Trend Micro, this time with text
- From: "Barry McConomy" <smile@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 18:02:23 -0500
I support what Ben said.
Trend Micro is the way to go, thier support department is good and care for
the clients after a sale is made.
My experience Symantec support is very negative.
Regards
Barry
"Gregg Hill" <bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O0UZCQkEGHA.1028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello!
>
> I tried to paste my text in the last message and it sent the message
> without my text!
>
> Anyway, I am comparing two products.
>
> Symantec Client Security with Groupware Protection, 25-user Business Pack
> = $1509.11 = $60.36 each
>
> Trend Micro Client Server Messaging Security for SMB, 25 licenses =
> $908.75 = $36.35 each
>
> Both products protect server and client file systems and POP3 mail, have
> client firewalls, and protect Exchange. What are your feelings on one vs.
> the other? Am I missing something in their respective features that would
> account for the price difference?
>
> Trend's ScanMail has been a lot more accurate for me than Symantec Mail
> Security for spam filtering, and it has an End User Quarantine that lets
> the end user approve senders if desired. It is even easier to use than
> Outlook's Junk E-Mail folder.
>
> Thank you for your time!
>
> Gregg Hill
>
>
>
.
- References:
- Symantec vs. Trend Micro, this time with text
- From: Gregg Hill
- Symantec vs. Trend Micro, this time with text
- Prev by Date: Re: Exchange Transaction Logs Issue
- Next by Date: Re: Determining Number of CALs in SBS 2000
- Previous by thread: Re: Symantec vs. Trend Micro, this time with text
- Next by thread: Re: Symantec vs. Trend Micro, this time with text
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
