Re: User CALs
- From: "Steve Foster [SBS MVP]" <steve.foster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:09:48 -0800
jonjof wrote:
Thanks - interesting observations. When I refer to 15 staff users, these will specificially need access on their own profiles [which will be roaming profiles], as they are regular users and need e-mail - fax etc.and also need to log onto different computers to where they might normally be stationed. Following your advice I will stick to the 15 licences I have already and have all the "testing" machines logged on with a single user account.
How staff members access the SBS is immaterial, it's just that every access from a device by a user *must* have either the device or the user covered by a CAL.
If the test stations are used by staff that are not among your stated 15, then those are not currently covered (since the existing 15 CALs are allocated to the "regular" 15, and neither the additional testers nor the devices they're using have CALs).
A little off topic, I have been using a NT4 machine as a domain controller for about 8 years now, running on a single 200 Mhz Pentium Pro processor with 4 x 2 Ghz SCSI drives! and it boots faster and responds faster on initial access to any settings than the dual 3 Ghz dual Xeon machine that I have started using with the new SBS server. I guess this is the cost of progress?
A plain DC that does nothing else should be pretty lightly loaded. You'd probably find that WS2003 in a similar configuration would probably be slightly quicker, and Win2K Server slightly slower (2003 has less installed than 2000).
Once I have accessed a specif function on the new server, it is quick to access this function again. I assume this is normal /expected behaviour with the newer server operating system? Hopefully as things have improved with XP over W2K, Microsoft will also improve this aspect on the Server OS?
SBS is heavily weighted towards the server applications, and it schedules the "administrator" user behind everything else (a snappy server GUI is not terribly important in the grand scheme of things).
-- Steve Foster [SBS MVP] --------------------------------------- MVPs do not work for Microsoft. Please reply only to the newsgroups. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: User CALs
- From: jonjof
- Re: User CALs
- References:
- User CALs
- From: Eugene Tan
- Re: User CALs
- From: jonjof
- Re: User CALs
- From: Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
- Re: User CALs
- From: jonjof
- Re: User CALs
- From: Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
- Re: User CALs
- From: jonjof
- Re: User CALs
- From: Steve Foster [SBS MVP]
- Re: User CALs
- From: jonjof
- User CALs
- Prev by Date: sudden DHCP issue
- Next by Date: Re: Adding network printers (and shares) to user or computer policy
- Previous by thread: Re: User CALs
- Next by thread: Re: User CALs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|