Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: "MikeR" <research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:30:24 -0800
Hi Brandy,
you again mention Service pack 1 below, but, this is already at service pack
2. Is this version issue not corrected in service pack 2? I don't see
anywhere in site settings, a way to look at the version number.
""Brandy Nee [MSFT]"" <v-branee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:xG2uL7fCGHA.1236@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello Mike,
>
> Thank you for posting back!
>
> I am sorry for the delayed response due to weekend. Please understand that
> the newsgroups are staffed weekdays by Microsoft Support professionals to
> answer your systems and applications questions. Your understanding is
> greatly appreciated!
>
> We use the Stsadm.exe command-line tool to force an upgrade of the content
> databases. Please seefollowing KB article for reference:
>
> The version number that is in Site Settings is not updated to 6.0.2.6361
> after you install Windows SharePoint Services Service Pack 1
> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=871149
>
> Due to complicated of the issue, I am still doing research on the issue.
> If I have any results, I will update you ASAP. Thanks a lot for your time
> and understanding!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brandy Nee
>
> Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
>
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> ======================================================
> This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues
> regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding
> newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner.
> You can locate the newsgroup here:
> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
>
> When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check
> the
> "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are
> any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader,
> please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your
> issue.
>
> Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we
> provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
> different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In
> doing
> so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
>
> For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please
> check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
>
> Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
> ======================================================
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
>
>
>
> --------------------
>>Reply-To: "MikeR" <research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>From: "MikeR" <research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>References: <OPXtColBGHA.628@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <MYfpc2rBGHA.3992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <#D72bxsBGHA.3604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <DrZ2ZDuBGHA.832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <u7yA6cxBGHA.4004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <#jBk0P6BGHA.1240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
>>Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:26:46 -0800
>>Lines: 172
>>Organization: my own
>>X-Priority: 3
>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>>Message-ID: <OxsuRb$BGHA.228@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: rollesolutions.com 66.92.0.119
>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl
>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:232234
>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>>
>>Hi Brandy
>>Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you as well!!
>>
>>Again, I think this is the appropriate group because it relates to the
>>Sharepoint update (
>>Windows SharePoint Services Service Pack 2 (KB887624)) performed on
> 11/24/05
>>I am not using sharepoint with mssql. Am using the MSDE instance. There
>>isn't even 100mb worth of data there so size isn't a problem. What does
> the
>>command line suggestion that you offered do? Before I do it I would like
> to
>>understand it.
>>
>>Again...very important to remember...this happened at the time of the
> update
>>listed above. What occurs during that upgrade? Specifically regarding
>>permissions either in the IIS end or the NTFS end? Possibly file path
>>changes?
>>
>>I do not know how to check the database size for the MSDE but again, I am
>>sure that it is not over 100mb.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>""Brandy Nee [MSFT]"" <v-branee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:%23jBk0P6BGHA.1240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Hello Mike,
>>>
>>> Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
>>>
>>> Thank you for posting back!
>>>
>>> Mike, actually, from the issue symptom, the issue seems to be more
> related
>>> to Windows SharePoint Service (WSS). The reason why we recommend
> customers
>>> that post in appropriate Newsgroup is you will gain the most qualified
>>> support and solve the issue more efficiency.
>>>
>>> If you still prefer to working in our Newsgroup, surely, I am glad to!
>>>
>>> I have performed a lot of research on your issue, and discussed with the
>>> engineers in SharePoint Newsgroup. The issue can be caused by varies of
>>> factors. Please see my following suggestions:
>>>
>>> ==============
>>>
>>> Suggestion 1:
>>>
>>> Login as a user NOT as an Administrator.
>>>
>>> 1) Go to Command Prompt (Start - Run - cmd).
>>>
>>> 2) <Drive:>\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\WebServer
>>> Extensions\60\BIN.
>>>
>>> 3) type the command:
>>>
>>> stsadm -o upgrade -forceupgrade (Press Enter)
>>>
>>> 4) Wait for some time (Until successfull... message).
>>>
>>> 5) Restart the system.
>>>
>>> Suggestion 2:
>>>
>>> Please double check if the SQL database is configured with a size limit
>>> and
>>> the limit is reached. If so, please try raising the limit and then
>>> upload
>>> again,
>>>
>>> NOTE: MSDE by default has a 2 GB limit for the database.
>>>
>>> If it is not the database size issue, I suggest we click "Modify
>>> settings
>>> and columns" in "Shared Documents" and check if there are any duplicated
>>> fields. If so, please remove one and then upload again.
>>>
>>> Also, please check if the certain port is blocked between SharePoint
>>> server
>>> and SQL server, for example, port 1433. If so, please enable it and
> upload
>>> again.
>>>
>>> Please take your time to perform the steps. If you have any updates,
>>> please
>>> feel free to let me know. I am looking forward to hearing from you!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Brandy Nee
>>>
>>> Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
>>>
>>> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>>> ======================================================
>>> This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues
>>> regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the
> corresponding
>>> newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely
> manner.
>>> You can locate the newsgroup here:
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
>>>
>>> When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check
>>> the
>>> "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there
>>> are
>>> any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your
>>> newsreader,
>>> please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we
>>> provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
>>> different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In
>>> doing
>>> so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
>>>
>>> For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly.
>>> Please
>>> check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
>>>
>>> Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
>>> ======================================================
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>> rights.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------
>>>>Reply-To: "MikeR" <research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>From: "MikeR" <research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>References: <OPXtColBGHA.628@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> <MYfpc2rBGHA.3992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> <#D72bxsBGHA.3604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> <DrZ2ZDuBGHA.832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Subject: Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
>>>>Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:46:14 -0800
>>>>Lines: 176
>>>>Organization: my own
>>>>X-Priority: 3
>>>>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>>>>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
>>>>X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>>>>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>>>>Message-ID: <u7yA6cxBGHA.4004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>>>>NNTP-Posting-Host: rollesolutions.com 66.92.0.119
>>>>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
>>>>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:232009
>>>>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>>>>
>>>>Hi brandy,
>>>>
>>>>I was going to say that I politely disagree but Susan beat me to it. I
>>> think
>>>>this is appropriately posted here as it relates to SBS03 and a very
> recent
>>>>windows update.
>>>>
>>>>Can anyone look at their permissions on the IIS end and let me know if
>>> only
>>>>read and directory browsing are checked? I wouldn't expect an update to
>>> have
>>>>changed something there but can't hurt to check.
>>>>
>>>>Again...I can add a document to the library but I cannot change it once
> it
>>>>is there and I used to be able to do that before that update.
>>>>
>>>>Does anyone know which account companyweb uses when accessing the actual
>>>>directory? Is it using the actual user account of the person accessing
>>>>sharepoint?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: "Brandy Nee [MSFT]"
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: "Brandy Nee [MSFT]"
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- References:
- after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: MikeR
- RE: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: "Brandy Nee [MSFT]"
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: MikeR
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: "Brandy Nee [MSFT]"
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: MikeR
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: "Brandy Nee [MSFT]"
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: MikeR
- Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- From: "Brandy Nee [MSFT]"
- after sharepoint 2.0 update
- Prev by Date: Re: repost-renaming faxes broke on companyweb after sharepoint update
- Next by Date: Re: Does anyone truly use Restricted User Accounts?
- Previous by thread: Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- Next by thread: Re: after sharepoint 2.0 update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|