Re: Windows server 2003 performance problem in Access
- From: "Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]" <gwdibble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:03:57 -0500
There are a lot of varying opinions on SMB signing. Here's an interesting
article
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/community/columns/secmgmt/sm0905.mspx
If you do end up disabling, I've found that the instructions on
www.smallbizserver.net are excellent and take out all of the guesswork from
the process.
As for the article, IMO all of Jesper Johansson's writings are interesting
and worth reading. You can just search on his name at www.microsoft.com to
find them.
"Lance" <lance.schaeffer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134581734.209753.161440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello,
>
> I am having some performance problems with an access database. The
> client computers are all running Windows XP SP2, and the server is
> running Windows server 2003. My situation is very similar to the one in
> this old topic at this link.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs/browse_frm/thread/7188759b0c85bf5a/e9f11abbad2c36b8?lnk=st&q=access+load+time+slow+server+2003&rnum=1#e9f11abbad2c36b8
>
> I tried to respond, but I could not figure out how - perhaps it is old
> and I cannot reply anymore.
>
> My question in response to the fix they suggest, which is disabling the
> security signature requirement, is the security implications this has.
> What exactly does this parameter control, and if i disable it, what are
> the potential affects?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lance
>
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Exchange forwarding to multiple recipients
- Next by Date: Re: Trend Micro V3 Issues
- Previous by thread: Windows server 2003 performance problem in Access
- Next by thread: Re: Windows server 2003 performance problem in Access
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
