Re: SBS2k3 group addressing problem (MS Xchng)



>When you say group, do you mean a distribution
> list created in Outlook?

Yes... thank you for clarifying. I appreciate your help, and I will try
using mail merge instead.

As for running a DMZ, yes that would be ideal with an SMTP server in it (it
would have also added some functionality that would be nice for the client,
including remote access). My philosophy to make something as secure as
absolutely possible when working with extremely sensitive data. While port
25 is not usually a security risk, I would prefer to not have an, as of yet,
undiscovered security hole in Win2003 server exploited through it when I have
another way of implementing. I understand that there are much larger risks
to the system than this, but it leaves one less thing to cover. Why not
block holes when you can?

I have had POP3 connection trouble in previous versions of SBS (meaning
management headache), but the small number of users and the opportunity to
close all ports outweighed the small management benefit. Budget is a huge
concern for the client as they are a non-profit entity upgrading on a
shoe-string or else your suggestion for a DMZ type of arrangement would have
been ideal.

--
Matt@synapsedata
Small Businesses should have the same support as large enterprises... we can
help!


"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" wrote:

>
>
> In news:D86D4995-EEB0-44A0-B90F-4F64E35B7D67@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> syndata <syndata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
> > Hi all,
> > I just recently switched a client from WinNT to SBS2003 server.
> > Everything is runing well with internal and external mail, except for
> > one thing.
> >
> > I am having a problem with a large number of undeliverables to known
> > good addresses outside our domain when the users use assigned groups
> > for large amounts of receipients. When an e-mail goes out to a user
> > defined group of 15 recipients or more, 20 to 30% of the group
> > addresses come back with an undeliverable message. The user then has
> > to resend the message to the "undeliverable" addresses.
> >
> > We are using multiple (9) POP3 connectors for mail delivery to the
> > server, and I cannot open the firewall ports to allow for an MX
> > account due to the amount of sensitive data stored internally.
> >
> > Everything else Xchng related is doing well including scheduling,
> > internal mail... etc. Anyone have a fix?
>
> Perhaps OT, but opening up port 25 inbound is rarely a security risk....and
> if it is, it's simple enough to set up another SMTP server in your DMZ that
> can accept mail for your domain and relay it to your Exchange server...so
> the latter accepts connections only from the relay server's IP address. The
> POP connector is a kluge, and is not recommended - and with 9 of them, I'd
> hate to have to manage it.
>
> That said, the POP connector is not the most likely culprit, because mail is
> sent using SMTP, not POP. When you say group, do you mean a distribution
> list created in Outlook? Mail merge to electronic mail may work a lot
> better, and you can use categories to make it easier to select the
> recipients. Note that with mass mail, if one of the addresses is malformed
> or delivery to it fails for some reason, it can hang up the whole lot,
> resulting in the problems you mention. But you should check to see what the
> number of recipients is limited to in your virtual SMTP server...and if you
> forward all outbound Internet mail to a smarthost, check with the people who
> manage that SMTP server to see what their limit might be.
>
>
>
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: SBS2k3 group addressing problem (MS Xchng)
    ... > I just recently switched a client from WinNT to SBS2003 server. ... POP connector is a kluge, and is not recommended - and with 9 of them, I'd ... forward all outbound Internet mail to a smarthost, ... manage that SMTP server to see what their limit might be. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: incomming SMTP not working
    ... test commands on port 25 and that works also. ... So, from outside your network, can you telnet on port 25 to your no-ip ... organization - I suggest you forward your outbound Internet mail to your ... ISP's SMTP server as a smarthost, ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Unable to send e-mail
    ... the SMTP server must be the same as the one providing your Internet ... If you use the same away-from-home connection frequently, ... Gmail uses port 465 for SMTP, which is not blocked like port 25 is. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.mail)
  • Re: Review NCL Crown Repositioning Cruise 10/23
    ... > email, and could get the internet, but their SMTP server would NOT ... > duplicating problem. ... to change from port 25 to port 587. ...
    (rec.travel.cruises)
  • Re: "C:InetpubmailrootQueue" - SCRIPT SOURCE included
    ... it is EXPECTED to be an SMTP server running at that IP ... Connecting To 64.26.130.103...Could not open a connection to host on port 25 ... inbound.registeredsite.com internet address = 64.224.219.122 ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis)