Re: It must be simple, but...
- From: "Mocacius" <mocacius@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 06:55:12 -0400
Thanks, Gregg. Your patience with someone that keeps saying, "Yes, but..."
is remarkable - it really is :-) I will try exactly what you suggested.
Sorry to be so stubborn :-(
BTW, is there an easy way to transfer all the settings of a local account
(on the client) to a new Domain account, or do I have to set everything up
manually?
Thanks again for your patience and good advice.
*M*
"Gregg Hill" <bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ePIMQ8H1FHA.3300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do exactly what I suggested and you will not be dizzy. You claim that
> "...but in this case it'd be better if I did" regarding sharing local
> drives. That may be the case, but you are still doing it incorrectly.
>
> I assume you have added both workstations to the new domain. If not, do so
> now. If they were members of a domain before, place them into a workgroup
> first, then add them to the SBS domain using the connectcomputer wizard.
>
> You are not doing what I recommended. DELETE the local accounts on the
> workstations. Do NOT "log on locally" as a local user; instead, log onto
> the DOMAIN, using the DOMAIN user accounts ONLY. Once you log on to the
> domain, you should be able to access server resources without further
> prompts for credentials.
>
> If you want the Client1 computer user to access Client2 computer folders,
> the easiest thing would be to add the Domain Users group to the share/NTFS
> permissions of the remote shared folder and give them whatever access you
> desire. Or, if you only want specific users to have access, then add
> Client1's desired DOMAIN user account to the share/NTFS permissions on
> Client2, and vice versa if you want 2 to access 1.
>
> Gregg Hill
>
>
>
>
> "Mocacius" <mocacius@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23h$DiFG1FHA.1740@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I understand why I shouldn't share the client drives, etc., and in general
>>I agree, but in this case it'd be better if I did.
>>
>> As far as the "Explanation Only" part, I even tried this...
>>
>> On the server - a logon was created UserName = UserN1, Pwd = trial335
>> On client1 - a local logon was created UserName = UserN1, Pwd =
>> trial335
>> On client 2 - a local logon was created UserName = UserN1, Pwd =
>> trial335
>>
>> All 3 user names and passwords are the same
>>
>> I then logged locally on client 1 and client 2 using the above
>> credentials, and then logged both clients on the domain (when accessing
>> the server shared drive), again, using the same credentials. Both
>> clients had the DOMAIN account in the shares permissions.
>>
>> I still could not access the client drives from each other.
>>
>> I'm getting dizzy <g>
>>
>> *M*
>>
>>
>> "Gregg Hill" <bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:eNslVxD1FHA.3464@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Mocacius,
>>>
>>> It looks as though you are mixing a peer-to-peer setup with a domain
>>> setup. Why did you create domain accounts on the server and local
>>> accounts on the workstations?
>>>
>>> Remove the local workstation accounts and just use the domain accounts
>>> you created on the server when you log into the workstations. That will
>>> create profiles on the workstations that contain the domain user
>>> information. You do not need local user accounts at all on the
>>> workstations.
>>>
>>> What is happening is that you have set up peer-to-peer permissions in a
>>> domain. In order for your plan to work (explanation only!!! Do NOT do
>>> this!!), you would have to create a LUSR01 local account on the Client2
>>> computer with the same password used on Client1, and a LUSR02 local
>>> account on the Client1 computer, with the same password as the Client1
>>> user. See how screwy that gets? All you need to do is dump the local
>>> accounts, log into each workstation as the domain account you created,
>>> and get authentication from the server.
>>>
>>> If you MUST share your client drives (bad move from a security
>>> standpoint), then add the DOMAIN account of each user to the two
>>> workstations' share permissions.
>>>
>>> Gregg Hill
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mocacius" <mocacius@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:%236IUrBA1FHA.3892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Just (finally <g>) moved the LAN to a new SBS2003 Server. At this
>>>> point, it's the only server, with 2 clients, both XP Pro.
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to make things work the way they user to work on NT4 (well
>>>> similar), but I think I must be missing something very basic. To
>>>> preface, on the recommendation from some in this NG, I purchased and
>>>> looked through the "Windws Small Business Server 2003", by Russel,
>>>> Crawford, Gerend, but I can't find the answers (may be because I don't
>>>> know what I'm looking for <smile>).
>>>>
>>>> Here is is in a nutshell..
>>>>
>>>> - SBS2003 has 2 user records created on it, U_SR01 and U_SR02, both
>>>> admin privileges
>>>> - Client #1, has a "local" user defined as LUSR01, Drive C is shared
>>>> for U_SR01 and U_SR02
>>>> - Client #2, has a "local" user defined as LUSR02, Drive C is shared
>>>> for U_SR01 and U_SR02
>>>>
>>>> Reboot all 3 systems
>>>> - Log on Client#1 as a local use, LUSR01
>>>> - Log on Client#2 as a local use, LUSR02
>>>>
>>>> From Client #1, through network neighborhood, I can see the SBS2003
>>>> server, and I can access its resources after I get prompted for and log
>>>> on as U_SR01.
>>>>
>>>> From Client #2, through network neighborhood, I can see the SBS2003
>>>> server, and I can access its resources after I get prompted for and log
>>>> on as U_SR02.
>>>>
>>>> From either client, I can see the other client, but when I try to
>>>> access the HD, I get an error message that I may not be authorized to
>>>> access it.
>>>>
>>>> I am probably missing something very simple, but you know, can't see
>>>> the forrest for the trees... :-(
>>>>
>>>> Any hints, anyone?
>>>>
>>>> *M*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: It must be simple, but...
- From: Gregg Hill
- Re: It must be simple, but...
- From: David Elders
- Re: It must be simple, but...
- References:
- Re: It must be simple, but...
- From: Gregg Hill
- Re: It must be simple, but...
- From: Gregg Hill
- Re: It must be simple, but...
- Prev by Date: Re: Can't get good connections from Windows XP to Sbs 2003
- Next by Date: RE: strange file showed up on my c: root
- Previous by thread: Re: It must be simple, but...
- Next by thread: Re: It must be simple, but...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|