Re: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
- From: v-edtian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Edward Tian)
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:21:20 GMT
Hi:
Thank you for the update.
I am glad to hear the information I provided helps.
If you encounter any difficulties in the future, please submit post to the
newsgroup, I am standing by to help you.
Again, thanks for using newsgroup.
Have a nice day!
Best Regards
Edward Tian(MSFT)
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues
regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding
newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner.
You can locate the newsgroup here:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check the
"Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are
any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader,
please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your
issue.
Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we
provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In doing
so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please
check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
| Thread-Topic: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
| thread-index: AcXMn+gPM3YdeVCaSlGeIzDYZCd9oQ==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 220.234.172.107
| From: =?Utf-8?B?VG9t?= <Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| References: <EEDD72DF-2D2D-4E93-84A1-B13D1BC7EAF8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<e#euSa#xFHA.780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<u#aXTEJyFHA.1168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<8WKCisKyFHA.1576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Subject: Re: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
| Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 00:06:01 -0700
| Lines: 211
| Message-ID: <C8BA738A-863C-47FE-86E8-48DBECCE625F@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:211422
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
|
| Thank you!
|
| "Edward Tian" wrote:
|
| > Hi Jeff:
| > Thank you for your reply.
| >
| > ISA Server 2000 included a bandwidth control feature. You could
right-click
| > on the Bandwidth Rules node and check a box to enable bandwidth
control,
| > then set an effective bandwidth in Kbps. Effective bandwidth refers to
| > either the actual bandwidth used by a device such as a modem, or
overall
| > network bandwidth. You could use bandwidth rules to specify which
| > connections would have priority over others.
| >
| > Although it seemed like a good idea, users complained that bandwidth
| > controls in ISA Server 2000 didnâ??t work, or didnâ??t work as
expected. Users
| > expected bandwidth controls to limit the amount of bandwidth that could
be
| > used by each connection. This was not how it worked. Instead, the
bandwidth
| > rules were used by the quality of service (QoS) packet scheduling
service
| > to determine how connections should be prioritized. More
disconcertingly,
| > even when you understood what the bandwidth rules did and didnâ??t do
and
| > configured them correctly, there were widespread problems with the
rules
| > ceasing to work over time. The only solution seemed to be to reformat
and
| > reinstall the operating system and ISA Server ,not something that the
| > average firewall administrator wants to do on a regular basis.
| >
| > For these reasons, support for the bandwidth control feature was
dropped in
| > ISA Server 2004.
| >
| > Hope the above information helps. Please feel free to let me know if
there
| > is anything I can do for you.
| >
| > Have a nice day! :)
| >
| > Best Regards
| > Edward Tian(MSFT)
| > Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
| >
| > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
| > ======================================================
| > This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues
| > regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the
corresponding
| > newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely
manner.
| > You can locate the newsgroup here:
| > http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
| >
| > When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check
the
| > "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there
are
| > any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your
newsreader,
| > please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your
| > issue.
| >
| > Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we
| > provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
| > different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In
doing
| > so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
| >
| > For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly.
Please
| > check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
| >
| > Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
| > ======================================================
| > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
| >
| > --------------------
| > | From: "Jeff Teel" <jdteel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | References: <EEDD72DF-2D2D-4E93-84A1-B13D1BC7EAF8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > <e#euSa#xFHA.780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | Subject: Re: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
| > | Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 22:09:43 -0500
| > | Lines: 111
| > | X-Priority: 3
| > | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
| > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
| > | X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
| > | Message-ID: <u#aXTEJyFHA.1168@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
| > | NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.230.187.18
| > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
| > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:158444
| > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
| > |
| > | Hi Edward
| > |
| > | If I remember correctly this post was doubled and I am only seeing
one of
| > | the posts now and I must have responded to the other post that I'm
not
| > | seeing for some reason. Anyway.......I had asked if there was any
| > particular
| > | reason why Microsoft removed the bandwidth control from ISA 2004. I
was
| > just
| > | curious. I didn't use it when I had ISA 2000 but it might have been
| > useful
| > | down the road if it were available!
| > |
| > | Anyway....I was just curious.
| > | Thanks
| > | Jeff
| > |
| > | "Edward Tian" <v-edtian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > | news:e%23euSa%23xFHA.780@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > Hi Tom:
| > | > Thank you for posting here. Hello Kevin, Jeff and Rick, thank you
for
| > all
| > | > your inputs.
| > | >
| > | > ISA Server 2004 Setup program will upgrade your current
configuration in
| > | > ISA Server 2000 automatically. Most ISA Server 2000 network
settings,
| > most
| > | > monitoring configurations, and most rules are upgraded to ISA
Server
| > 2004.
| > | > The following ISA Server 2000 objects and configuration settings
are not
| > | > migrated to ISA Server 2004:
| > | >
| > | > 1. Bandwidth rules are no longer supported in ISA Server 2004, so
it is
| > | > not
| > | > migrated.
| > | > 2. Permission settings, such as system access control lists
(SACLs), are
| > | > not upgraded.
| > | > 3. Logging and reporting configuration and information are not
migrated.
| > | >
| > | > You may refer to the following KB article:
| > | >
| > | > 840697 ISA Server 2000 settings and features that are not supported
| > when
| > | > you
| > | > http://support.microsoft.com/?id=840697
| > | >
| > | > Thank you for your understanding! If there is anything I can do for
you,
| > | > please do not hesitate to let me know.
| > | >
| > | > Have a nice day!
| > | >
| > | > Best Regards
| > | > Edward Tian(MSFT)
| > | > Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
| > | >
| > | > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
| > | > ======================================================
| > | > This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have
issues
| > | > regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the
| > corresponding
| > | > newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely
| > manner.
| > | > You can locate the newsgroup here:
| > | > http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
| > | >
| > | > When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you
check
| > | > the
| > | > "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when
there
| > are
| > | > any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your
| > newsreader,
| > | > please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from
your
| > | > issue.
| > | >
| > | > Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread.
Although we
| > | > provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
| > | > different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean.
In
| > | > doing
| > | > so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
| > | >
| > | > For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly.
| > Please
| > | > check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone
numbers.
| > | >
| > | > Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
| > | > ======================================================
| > | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
| > | > rights.
| > | >
| > | > --------------------
| > | > | Thread-Topic: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
| > | > | thread-index: AcXHrPv1bTftWdbZT9iA2lwS+9H/jQ==
| > | > | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 220.234.172.107
| > | > | From: =?Utf-8?B?VG9t?= <Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | > | Subject: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
| > | > | Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 16:57:02 -0700
| > | > | Lines: 6
| > | > | Message-ID: <EEDD72DF-2D2D-4E93-84A1-B13D1BC7EAF8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | > | MIME-Version: 1.0
| > | > | Content-Type: text/plain;
| > | > | charset="Utf-8"
| > | > | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| > | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| > | > | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| > | > | Importance: normal
| > | > | Priority: normal
| > | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| > | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
| > | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| > | > | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| > | > | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:158079
| > | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
| > | > |
| > | > | Hi:
| > | > | Does ISA 2004 has the bandwidth control feature? I cannot find it
in
| > the
| > | > | console. I ask this quetion because I have seen the "Bandwidth
rules"
| > in
| > | > ISA
| > | > | 2000.
| > | > |
| > | > | Thanks in advance
| > | > |
| > | >
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
.
- References:
- Re: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
- From: Edward Tian
- Re: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
- From: Tom
- Re: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
- Prev by Date: Re: Multi-homed network topology
- Next by Date: RE: How to enable Autoconfiguration in ISA2004
- Previous by thread: Re: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
- Next by thread: Re: Does ISA 2004 has this rule?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
