Re: Site to Site VPN 2 SBS servers
- From: v-chayan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ("Charles Yang [MSFT]")
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 07:34:05 GMT
Hi Danny,
I am very happy to hear that your friends company now works well for the
site to site VPN.
Thanks also for good sharing, I think the information you get from MS CSS
should be an excellent good sharing.
Thanks again for your effort in this issue, please feel free to post here,
we have many partner and supporter also MVP they are try their best to help
resolve the issue.
Have a nice day!
Best regards,
Charles Yang (MSFT)
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
======================================================
This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues
regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding
newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner.
You can locate the newsgroup here:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx
When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check the
"Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are
any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader,
please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your
issue.
Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we
provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post
different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In doing
so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner.
For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please
check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.
Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated.
======================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
| From: "TimeTraveller" <TimeTraveller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| References: <eQCUymlsFHA.3720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN 2 SBS servers
| Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 07:15:31 +0100
| Lines: 99
| X-Priority: 3
| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.1830
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
| X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
| Message-ID: <uFuJjXQtFHA.3908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
| NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-34-13-254.cable.ubr02.basi.blueyonder.co.uk
82.34.13.254
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:151963
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
|
| Update and Solution,
|
| Ok firstly I am a little dissapointed with some of the responses to this!
I
| did originally ask that you didnt use supposition and only respond if you
| had actually achieved this.
|
| I can now tell you after achieving this VPN between two SBS servers in
| different physical locations and domains that it works fine and is no
| different to two separate Windows NT/2000/2003 domains using a Site -
Site
| VPN as I originally thought - please read questions more thouroughly and
| dont make speculative assumptions from an "Ivory Tower = All Knowing Eye
| perspective". its good to be wrong sometimes - "Try to think out of the
box
| sometimes", if you are on a site that has this scenario and you tell them
| "It cant be done" or "You have the wrong setup mate" you will have a very
| short career, its nearly always possible somehow even if you do have to
| conjure up things sometimes.
|
| Anyway thats enough of the bitching - thanks for your inputs.
|
| I have to give the Points to Charles for his non-Assumptive approach and
| willingless to help, also to Lethos who has detailed the required steps
that
| achieved some of the goals of Authentication/Name resolution whilst being
| open to the idea that it may/could be done
|
| Fix was apply:
| http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=897651
|
| This enabled any one side to make a connection and be able to ping the
| other - but 2 way pings were not possible.
|
| Deactiviated and recreated RRAS on both servers created the Site to Site
VPN
| = Everything works fine now. Branch connects to main office and both
sides
| can ping correctly at the same time - resolved the server names at each
site
| by creating forward zones in DNS for the other side, also put a Static
WINS
| entry to achieve the same thing for netbios names.
|
| Result is that ping to IP or NetBios Name or FQDN work faultlessly.
|
| As these are two unrelated domains had to create SAME user/Pass
combination
| for the particular users to access some resources on the other site -
|
| TT
|
| "TimeTraveller" <TimeTraveller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:eQCUymlsFHA.3720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Hello All,
| >
| > I have done this with normal 2000/2003 servers and RRAS/ISA server, my
| > question is can I create a VPN (please only reply if you have actually
| > done this and not use supposition) between Two SBS servers ?
| >
| > I believe it should be much the same as with 2000/2003 servers etc. but
| > would like some validation and any errors that are possible here.
| >
| > A friend has tried this but keeps getting licensing errors when trying
to
| > connect.
| >
| > When I try to connect with PPTP, most of the time I get the error:
| >
| > Event Type: Error
| >
| > Event Source: RemoteAccess
| >
| > Event Category: None
| >
| > Event ID: 20111
| >
| > Date: 05/09/2005
| >
| > Time: 12:36:14 PM
| >
| > User: N/A
| >
| > Computer: SERVER
| >
| > Description:
| >
| > A Demand Dial connection to the remote interface Server on port
| >
| > VPN5-127 was successfully initiated but failed to complete successfully
| > because of the following error: No more connections can be made to this
| > remote computer at this time because there are already as many
connections
| > as the computer can accept.
| >
| >
| >
| > Any ideas would be appreciated
| >
| >
| >
| > Regards
| >
| >
| >
| > TT
| >
| >
|
|
|
.
- References:
- Site to Site VPN 2 SBS servers
- From: TimeTraveller
- Re: Site to Site VPN 2 SBS servers
- From: TimeTraveller
- Site to Site VPN 2 SBS servers
- Prev by Date: Re: Error 1030
- Next by Date: RE: Workstations log off
- Previous by thread: Re: Site to Site VPN 2 SBS servers
- Next by thread: Replication isse with SBS 2003 and additional W2K3 server on remote site
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
