RE: Whther to overwrite dapi.dll during upgrade SBS2000 to 2003

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

Thanks for your reassurance Ed. I will proceed with confidence.

Mark

"Edward Tian" wrote:

> Dear Mark:
> Thank you for posting here.
>
> I have consulted with my colleague of Exchange team, since you are
> upgrading from Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003, you can overwrite this file.
> It won't cause any problems.
>
> Please feel free to let me know if you have any concerns.
>
> Have a nice day! :)
>
> Best Regards
> Edward Tian(MSFT)
> Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
>
> --------------------
> | Thread-Topic: Whther to overwrite dapi.dll during upgrade SBS2000 to 2003
> | thread-index: AcWuE3TFyIrrftx5SpOXmKgMOqRz7w==
> | X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 218.214.6.198
> | From: "=?Utf-8?B?VG9vbA==?=" <Tool@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | Subject: Whther to overwrite dapi.dll during upgrade SBS2000 to 2003
> | Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:05:03 -0700
> | Lines: 15
> | Message-ID: <75C126C9-8A7B-4B59-BB0F-7BBA6EC259F7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> | MIME-Version: 1.0
> | Content-Type: text/plain;
> | charset="Utf-8"
> | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> | Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> | Importance: normal
> | Priority: normal
> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
> | NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
> | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:149500
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
> |
> | When doing an inplace upgrade of SBS 2000 SP1 to SBS 2003 SP1 I get the
> | following dialog:
> |
> | Confirm Replace
> | Source: h:\exchsrvr65\setup\i386\exchange\dapi.dll
> | Target: C:\WINNT\System32\dapi.dll
> | The target exists and is newer than the source.
> | Overwrite the newer file? Yes or No.
> |
> | I chose YES, seeing as I wanted the set off the new cds. I have tried
> this
> | twice on the same original image and received the same message both times.
> |
> | Is this something I should be concerned about?
> |
> | Mark
> |
>
>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SysInternals acquired by Microsoft
    ... be analyzed and can viewed as a direction of this technology. ... Mark has to be admired for all the effort ... and this is POWERFUL technology that Microsoft must have in its IP ... Not in my paranoid mind. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: SysInternals acquired by Microsoft
    ... significant OS vendor for its lack of security of stopping it. ... Mark has to be admired for all the effort over ... and this is POWERFUL technology that Microsoft must have in its IP ... Next Web Base Windows Authentication Checks, ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: SysInternals acquired by Microsoft
    ... significant OS vendor for its lack of security of stopping it. ... Mark has to be admired for all the effort over ... and this is POWERFUL technology that Microsoft must have in its IP ... Next Web Base Windows Authentication Checks, ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
  • Re: I get the prompt window "Restarting your computer is required"
    ... implemented the Microsoft fix. ... This pop up started quite awhile ago so I think backing out updates would ... Mark L. Ferguson MS-MVP ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: SysInternals acquired by Microsoft
    ... and this is POWERFUL technology that Microsoft must have in its IP ... Controlling this technology will limit exposure. ... You state this was about the Sony Rootkit episode, first what has Mark ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)