Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: "Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]" <les.connor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:19:09 -0500
Somebody has to know mDaemon ;-0.
mDaemon is a good product, but putting it on SBS is ....... um ...... kinda
like taking the engine out of your new Chev and putting a Chrysler in it's
place simply becasue you're more familiar with the Chyrysler. Of course,
none of the integration Chev designed works anymore ;-).
If there are any consistent probems with Exchange on SBS, then it's been
misconfigured. Exchange is designed to efficiently handle hundreds, even
thousands of users. It doesn't even warm up in an SBS environment.
With SBS, the remote administration capabilities are such that a biz doesn't
need an on-site administrator. That's the whole point of remote
administration.
C'mon folks, you're doing your clients a disservice.
--
Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
-----------------------------------------------------------
SBS Rocks !
"Zack" <Zack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5B382186-9D5E-4EA0-80FE-8552B60BC9C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Ok, I am a consultant, I am also a Network Admin for a med sized ISP, &
> have
> sbs 2003 server on our network. I don't sugest exchange server to any
> company
> that doesn't have their own internal IT department. The issues they can
> get
> into are just not worth it, it will cause them to call someone else if
> they
> have an issue. (I don't mind being the one getting paid when they call,
> but I
> rather my clients don't have problems.)
> We use Mdaemon mail server for our ISP, and it includes almost every
> feature
> that Exchange does without Exchange. I sell those services to my clients
> and
> don't have to worry about 20 different clients exchange servers for them.
>
> Just my 2 cents
>
> Zack
>
> "Leythos" wrote:
>
>> In article <uhIfMtUpFHA.3568@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>> > They are just trying to spare me additional compexities and expense,
>> > since we have a very low IT budget.
>>
>> What did you do for email virus scanning at the store level?
>> What did you do for attachment blocking based on attachment type?
>> What did you do for spam filtering?
>>
>> Have you setup a script to delete the BADMAIL folder contents?
>>
>> Have you checked the logs to make sure that the backup is working and
>> that you are not growing 5mb logs for each day?
>>
>> Have you tried to restore any emails yet?
>>
>> Just things you might want to consider - and again, I'm not suggesting
>> that you don't use Exchange, just wondering if you've done anything
>> about the items above.
>>
>> And so you know, it's easy to do all of the above, so I'm not trying to
>> use that as a suggestion to not run exchange like some people here seem
>> to think.
>>
>> --
>>
>> spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx
>> remove 999 in order to email me
>>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: David F
- Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- References:
- To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: David F
- Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
- Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: Russ Grover
- Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
- Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
- Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: David F
- Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- From: Zack
- To Exchange or not to Exchange
- Prev by Date: Re: SBS QoS with VoIP
- Next by Date: Re: SBS MVP wanted
- Previous by thread: Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- Next by thread: Re: To Exchange or not to Exchange
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|