Re: Outbound email, but no inbound

Les,

Thanks for the reply... Sorry that I neglected to say that I ran this
before and saw the errors... I did check with the ISP provider and of course
they say all is okay... However, I did ask for a senior tech to give me a
call back (still waiting)...

Also, the info that follows is from an email headerfrom an email sent from
an external source and was denied... Does this reveal anything that might
point directly to what the issue is?

>>>>>

The original message was received at Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:05:51 -0400 (EDT)
from imo-m23.mail.aol.com [172.20.107.69]


*** ATTENTION ***

Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its
delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----".

The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section
labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----".

The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could
not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a
general translation for other e-mail servers.

Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
administrator or Postmaster at that destination.

--AOL Postmaster



----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<dnorton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

----- Transcript of session follows -----
.... while talking to mail.microkey.com.:
>>> MAIL From:<NOTTIE@xxxxxxx> SIZE=590
<<< 454 5.7.3 Client does not have permission to submit mail to this server.
<dnorton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>... Deferred: 454 5.7.3 Client does not have
permission to
submit mail to this server.
Message could not be delivered for 3 hours
Message will be deleted from queue

Final-Recipient: RFC822; dnorton@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Action: failed
Status: 4.4.7
Remote-MTA: DNS; mail.microkey.com
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 454 5.7.3 Client does not have permission to submit
mail
to this server.
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:07:37 -0400 (EDT)

Received: from imo-m23.mx.aol.com (imo-m23.mail.aol.com [172.20.107.69]) by
imr-d03.mx.aol.com (v98.19) with ESMTP id RELAYIN1-242f766bf280; Mon, 08 Aug
2005 10:05:51 -0400
Received: from NOTTIE@xxxxxxx
by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r4.1.) id 3.83.2d237525 (16109)
for <dnorton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:18:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MBLK-M27 (mblk-m27.mblk.aol.com [64.12.136.71]) by
air-id12.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id MAILINID121-3eed42f74d851f9;
Mon, 08
Aug 2005 08:18:13 -0400
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:18:13 -0400
From: nottie@xxxxxxx
Message-Id: <8C76A2A6220FB89-FF4-6FDC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Received: from 199.72.34.130 by MBLK-M27.sysops.aol.com (64.12.136.71) with
HTTP
(WebMailUI); Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:18:13 -0400
X-Mailer: AOL WebMail 1.1.0.13507
Subject: test into work
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary="--------MailBlocks_8C76A2A6220FB89_FF4_66E3_MBLK-M27.sysops.aol.com"
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnorton@xxxxxxxxxxxx
X-AOL-IP: 172.20.107.69
X-Spam-Flag: NO

>>>>>

Once again, thanks for the assistance!

"Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS M" wrote:

> Hi Clarence,
>
> Here's a link to a report for microkey.com, and mail.microkey.com is indeed
> unreachable from the internet. There are a number of warnings in the report,
> have a look and see if you need to discuss these with your ISP or domain
> host.
>
> Hang on. Now it's reachable.
>
> http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=microkey.com
>
> --
> Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> SBS Rocks !
>
>
> "Clarence" <Clarence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:D038E29D-CBE7-4DF2-B2EE-CB435F72D639@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Hi Les,
> >
> > Our domain is microkey.com
> > MX record points to mail.microkey.com
> >
> > If any other info needed, just inquire....
> >
> > Thnaks for the reply!
> >
> > "Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS M" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Clarence,
> >>
> >> What's your domain name, we'll check it out.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> SBS Rocks !
> >>
> >>
> >> "Clarence" <Clarence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:0F9F2776-84F5-4293-A043-0B0CCDFDFE94@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Can anyone assist me i determining the actions needed to correct this
> >> > issue:
> >> >
> >> > Using a single nic, behing a Watchguard firewall
> >> >
> >> > - Outbound email has been configured and is working.
> >> > - No inbound email
> >> > - Verified port 25 (tcp) open o firewall both ways
> >> > - verified using 'telnet maila.microsoft.com 25' and recv'd appropiate
> >> > response, then used 'ehlo microkey.com' and recv'd a bunch of 250
> >> > replies
> >> > - MX record on ISP's dns server, however the authoratative dns servers
> >> > used
> >> > are those at our telco (not same dns servers).. NOTE: Recv'd email
> >> > fine
> >> > under system we migrated from..
> >> > - Not really sure what I'm missing as everything seems to be setup
> >> > correctly...
> >> > - IS it necessary to have a MX record on the local dns server (SBS
> >> > box)??
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for any assistance o this matter!!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DCOM security in Windows Server 2003 SP1
    ... it's unfortunate that they chose a different name for it in the server edition if it's indeed the same thing. ... DCOM by one account or set COAUTHINFO in COSERVERINFO in CoCreateInstanceEx) with special activation privilege, for example, a domain account in the newly created build-in group "Distributed DCOM user", and switch back to the identity that runs the client program after the activation? ... like to grand remote activation permission to "Everyone" in the computerwide restrictions or DCOM limits whatever it is called, just because our client program fails. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ole)
  • Re: Code Permission - Should I write a custom "Friend Permission" (or
    ... If you can consider your server to be safe from direct meddling, ... need to worry about a client directly disabling CAS on your server. ... BTW, on the side issue of authoring a custom permission, it's not generally ... declaring the permission attribute from the local policy assemblies list. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: Possible permissions bug on NFSv3 kernel client
    ... Permission bits are on the server, ... defined on the *server* not on the client. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Adjusting security setting to run an embedded windows control in IE
    ... I need WebPermission in order to send data from server to client. ... It's a little fuzzy how all this security work, but as I understood, I can ... I can force my code to connect back to my server only... ... my code need permission from client to do that connection? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Adjusting security setting to run an embedded windows control in IE
    ... I need WebPermission in order to send data from server to client. ... It's a little fuzzy how all this security work, but as I understood, I can ... I can force my code to connect back to my server only... ... my code need permission from client to do that connection? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.security)