Re: SBS Exchange Issue
- From: "Rick F" <rick.REMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:56:07 -0500
Personally, I would stop using POP3 and go the SMTP route and have Exchange
handle your email completely.
--
Rick Faria - MCSE / A+
RDF Technical Services - www.rdfts.com
Email: support at rdfts dot com
"Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]" <kweilbacMVP@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e6ldyDefFHA.576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> known issue with sbs2003. see:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;264249
>
> --
> Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
> "The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"
>
>
> "Geoff Hall" <smeghead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Ob0zjjdfFHA.352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Pulled off a swing migration from SBS2000 to SBS2003 on new hardware last
>> week using the kit from sbsmigration.com and a VM interim.
>>
>> No problems at all everything went by the book and virtually no downtime.
>>
>> I have however possibly inherited a pop3 downloader issue.
>>
>> When an incoming mail collected by the sbs pop3 collector is retrieved
>> from the isp and it contains more than one local recipient each recipient
>> gets as many copies of the mail as there are recipients.
>> Eg. six recipients in the to field = six messages for each of the six
>> recipients
>>
>> Any ideas!
>>
>> Geoff
>
>
.
- References:
- SBS Exchange Issue
- From: Geoff Hall
- Re: SBS Exchange Issue
- From: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
- SBS Exchange Issue
- Prev by Date: Re: Excessive Logon Failures in the Security Event Log
- Next by Date: Re: Recommended Specs for Premium Edition
- Previous by thread: Re: SBS Exchange Issue
- Next by thread: Re: SBS Exchange Issue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|