Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- From: "Tony Su" <TonySu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:33:03 -0700
Matt,
This question on whether to post IPCONFIG has been discussed to death.
A short discussion which I participated is in Susan's blog archives. I'm not
the only person to question this practice, in summary the information by
itself is not a fatal compromise but
- It's a substantial amount of very useful information to a hacker
- Like everything else posted to a public forum/Internet, the information
lives forever.
In other words, the exploit that uses the information may not be common
practice today, but if the information is still valid 8 years from now and
the exploit is developed that uses that information, you'll regret what you
thought was a minor indescretion.
Tony
"Matt Gibson" wrote:
>
> > Although others might disagree with me, I generally discourage posting
> > IPCONFIGS for security reasons, but if there is no alternative the bottom
> > line is getting fixed.
>
> Posting this makes people think there IS a security risk to it.
>
> You're spreading FUD, and making it harder for us to help people in this
> newsgroup.
>
> Please stop.
>
> Matt Gibson - GSEC
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- From: Matt Gibson
- Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- References:
- userenv and NETLOGON errors
- From: jaredea
- Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- From: Matt Gibson
- Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- From: Tony Su
- Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- From: Matt Gibson
- userenv and NETLOGON errors
- Prev by Date: Mirrored Drive
- Next by Date: Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- Previous by thread: Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- Next by thread: Re: userenv and NETLOGON errors
- Index(es):