Re: CAL question
- From: "Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]" <javier_gomez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:35:17 -0400
The concept of Device or User CALs is a legal one, not technical. In other
words... SBS doesn't track which CALs are which.
You are the one responsable to "assign" an User CAL to John Doe or a Device
CAL to his computer... and to keep records of it so when the licensing
police come knocking on your door you can say "Here's how CALs are
distributed!".
Weird, isn't it? :-)
--
Javier [SBS MVP]
www.msmvps.com/javier
<< SBS ROCKS!!! >>
"Chuck" <Chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E55FEA37-8BD9-4890-BA1A-9C833974CB54@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> I have a CAL question.
>
> If I add a computer to the network I realize that I'm using a Device CAL,
> if
> I add a user that accesses only remotely I think I'm using a user CAL. Now
> the question. If I add a computer and then in AD make the user of that
> computer a mobile user so that they can connect remotely am I using two
> CALS?
>
> I have several users here that work at one computer 90% of the time but
> want
> to access RWW and Outlook when they are either at home or away on sales
> trips.
>
> Thanks for putting up with this basic question.
> Chuck
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CAL question
- From: Dirk-Thomas Brown
- Re: CAL question
- References:
- CAL question
- From: Chuck
- CAL question
- Prev by Date: Problem Gone...
- Next by Date: Re: Connectivity issues after 5 p.m. with SBS2003
- Previous by thread: Re: CAL question
- Next by thread: Re: CAL question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|