Re: SBS2003 for 3 locations
- From: "TR" <tsomething@somewhere>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:15:23 -0400
thanks for the info Matt
"Matt Gibson" <mattg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eAWCNp4bFHA.1040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Personally, if there's more than a few computers in each remote office, I
> like to see another DC/GC at each office, so that you don't have to drop
> down to cached credientials, and you have a local file store for each
> office.
>
> Other than that, SBS 2003 premium is fine for him. Just remember that a
> DSL is "faster" than T1 for download, so people pulling files off the
> server will be limited to .193MB/s MAX.
>
> Matt Gibson - GSEC
>
> "TR" <tsomething@somewhere> wrote in message
> news:eFXx4m4bFHA.584@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a client with 3 offices. One location has a T1 and 2 satellite
>> locations have DSL. He has a total of 22 computers among the 3 locations
>> he would like to tie together with a server for file sharing, internet
>> access, e-mail, firewall, etc. Is SBS2003 Premium a good solution for
>> him? He ideally wants the Server at the main office and all workstations
>> (local and remote) connected to the domain.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> TR
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- SBS2003 for 3 locations
- From: TR
- Re: SBS2003 for 3 locations
- From: Matt Gibson
- SBS2003 for 3 locations
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems with Transition pack
- Next by Date: Re: SBS2003 for 3 locations
- Previous by thread: Re: SBS2003 for 3 locations
- Next by thread: Re: SBS2003 for 3 locations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|