Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- From: "Rick Dilley" <rdilley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:10:44 -0400
Hi Matt,
And all along I thought I was doing a "good" thing.
I'd appreciate if you would describe(in detail) what you'd consider a "good"
and safe implementation of SBS2000 with a wireless LAN segment.
I am serious and not just "pulling your chain"...I really did think I was
doing it "right"
So "help me Obe Wan...you are my only hope"
RickD
"Matt Gibson" <mattg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O4panIEbFHA.2212@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Oi.
>
> In my mind, turning off SSID broadcasting is even worse than MAC
filtering.
> It stops XP from being able to do it's zero configuration service, and
it's
> even faster for a "hacker" to determine what the SSID is.
>
> Do you guys LIKE making things harder for yourselves?
>
> Matt Gibson - GSEC
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- From: Matt Gibson
- Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- References:
- SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- From: stan johnson jr
- Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- From: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
- Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- From: Russ Grover
- Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- From: Matt Gibson
- Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- From: Rick Dilley
- Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- From: Matt Gibson
- SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- Prev by Date: Mail Alias's
- Next by Date: Re: What is X400?
- Previous by thread: Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- Next by thread: Re: SBS 2000 and wireless LAN
- Index(es):