Re: firewalls 2 n ics and headaches :0
- From: "patrick" <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:58:08 -0700
hi greg,
when you say hard code one nic to do match the internal network on the sonic
wall and the other for the range , can you be more specific ?
thanks
"Greg" wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> I have set this up many times. I would disable DHCP on the sonic wall.
> Hard code one nic to match the internal network on the sonicwall and the
> other for the range of your machines.
>
> I would then use DHCP, WINS and of course DNS from SBS2003. Works like a
> champ.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Greg
> "patrick" <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:5FF1DF9E-B2D1-44DC-BBD6-8DCEF5C574CE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > hi , i have a hp server , with 2 nics, i also have a sonic wall firewall ,
> > handlining dhcp and all firewall activity.
> >
> > my question is that i have been told i should disable one of the nics on
> > the
> > server as the sonic wall is handling the firewall
> >
> > is this correct ?
> >
> > also for some reason i cant access email from outside the firewall, i can
> > access it using OWA but not if i set up outlook at a remote location, also
> > no
> > remote desktop aceess.
> >
> > thanks
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: firewalls 2 n ics and headaches :0
- From: JML
- Re: firewalls 2 n ics and headaches :0
- References:
- firewalls 2 n ics and headaches :0
- From: patrick
- Re: firewalls 2 n ics and headaches :0
- From: Greg
- firewalls 2 n ics and headaches :0
- Prev by Date: Re: Site to Site networking
- Next by Date: Re: Web Hosting on a SBS2003 member server
- Previous by thread: Re: firewalls 2 n ics and headaches :0
- Next by thread: Re: firewalls 2 n ics and headaches :0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading