Re: Email....what to do part2 :)



If the remote users are using Outlook 2003, they can connect directly to
Exchange via RPC-over-HTTP. If they aren't using Outlook 2003, the can
connect Outlook directly to Exchange by VPNing into the server as opposed to
VPNing into the router. For this to work you'll need to set up RAS on the
server and forward PPTP through the firewall. Takes several steps to set it
up, but my users love being able to use Outlook directly. It's also fairly
simple to set up DHCP on the server instead of on the router (with a one-NIC
setup there can be only one DHCP). The remote users don't need to be part of
the domain to use Outlook under this arrangement, although all of my remote
users use the domain name as the workgroup name.

GaryK

"maxian" <maxian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BE903C88-6D74-4ECF-9216-FCF63A40FF84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> OK, you all have me talked into and pumped about my using the SBS
> Exchange.
> I have a few more questions. Mainly the infrastructure of the network.
>
> Main Office
> 1. Business static ip with Road Runner.
> 2. Netgear FWAG114 router/firewall
> a. router is handling the DHCP
> b. DNS is pointing to Road Runner
> c. VPN running with office in Dallas and my Home
> 3. SBS Server 2003 Standard.
> a. DNS is pointing to the servers LAN address : 192.168.1.103
>
> Dallas Office (no server)
> 1. SBC DSL Business Static IP
> 2. Netgear router FWAG114
> a. DHCP running on router
> b. VPN hitting the Main office router
> c. they are not logging into the server, but they do have user
> accounts
> on the server. They are using the server drives and the Companyweb.
> (They
> would be lost with out this)
>
> A couple of questions:
> 1. With the main office setup...after I get the A record pointing to the
> static IP address and the MX record pointing to the A record is Exchange
> going to work with the SBS server DNS pointing to its own Local address?
>
> 2. Will the Dallas office be able to setup their mail accounts using
> exchange even if their computers are not part of the domain?
>
> I'm sure more question will come. :) I'm kinda scared to change
> anything...it has been working really well since last July.
>
> Thanks again for all who answered my question on Saturday. This site has
> been the most helpfull site for me on the internet. Thank you so much
> guys!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> j mager
> IT ACT Houston - ACT Dallas


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Critical e-mail problem.
    ... I upgraded from Win2K Server to WinSBS2003 on my desktop ... of my POP3 e-mail accounts as an Exchange Server account. ... I found that I was only receiving mail from the Exchange ... your Outlook profile will have Exchange as its default (and this ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Critical e-mail problem.
    ... I upgraded from Win2K Server to WinSBS2003 on my desktop ... of my POP3 e-mail accounts as an Exchange Server account. ... I found that I was only receiving mail from the Exchange ... your Outlook profile will have Exchange as its default (and this ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: more than two MX record
    ... the second ip address and therefore to my router number two ... domain that can directly send messages to your Exchange server. ... outside email to bypass your spam firewall at some point.. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Re: Advice needed - running Exchange
    ... the router to your nic ... You'll need to have your ISP create two additional DNS records for your ... delivery is set to the Exchange mailbox, ... I currently only have one NIC in my SBS server ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Faxe per Email über Outlook-2003
    ... Der Exchange Server ist ein Groupware- und Messaging-System der Firma ... Microsoft Exchange Server benutzt ein proprietäres RPC Protokoll namens ... Microsoft Office Outlook Web Access ...
    (microsoft.public.de.outlook)

Quantcast