Re: SBS 2003 partitions
- From: "tester" <tester@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:35:40 -0700
Personally, 12 gb is not enough on c when you factor swap space (if not
moved) and shadow copies.
Just my $.02
"Matt Gibson" <mattg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u%23HtdgxVFHA.3184@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Create multiple partitions.
>
> Place Exchange/ISA/SQL on one (Depending on which ones you use, anywhere
> from 35GB on up)
>
> Place User Shared Folders/Company Data on another.
>
> If you really want to be paranoid with security, place IIS on a partition
> all of it's own.
>
> Matt Gibson - GSEC
>
> "TB Player" <psychobuffalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23YL0YDxVFHA.3764@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I am re-installing SBS 2003 on my Dell server, and I have a 160GB drive. I
>> am installing the OS on a 12GB partition (C:) as per Dell's
>> recommendation.
>> My question is, is there any advantage to creating more than one
>> partition
>> with the remaining 148GB, or should I just leave it as a single "D:"
>> partition?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> TB
>
>
.
- References:
- Re: SBS 2003 partitions
- From: Matt Gibson
- Re: SBS 2003 partitions
- Prev by Date: Re: How about upgrade exchange on sbs to exchange enterprise
- Next by Date: RE: Inaccessible Boot Device
- Previous by thread: Re: SBS 2003 partitions
- Next by thread: Re: SBS 2003 partitions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
