RE: Question...

I think it is driving towards disaster recovery. Am I correct?

""Damian N Leibaschoff [MSFT]"" wrote:

> Hi,
> Security should be on top of your list.
>
> You can find several resources here:
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/techinfo/productdoc/default.m
> spx
>
> For example:
> http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/f/1/1f15a874-f696-4992-b5ad-b1e7b25
> 8de1c/SecuringSBSnetwork.doc
>
> Regards,
> Damian
>
> --------------------
> >Thread-Topic: Question...
> >thread-index: AcVQtcd6j9rXAZNHTbyV/OsNQGC9GA==
> >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 83.104.194.213
> >From: =?Utf-8?B?U2tj?= <Skc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Question...
> >Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 07:30:11 -0700
> >Lines: 25
> >Message-ID: <258C357A-EB57-4738-93F7-695DCB8ACB29@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="Utf-8"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
> >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
> >Importance: normal
> >Priority: normal
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
> >NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
> >Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
> >Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:116142
> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
> >
> >I am an IT manager for a SBS2003 network with around 50 clients. These
> are
> >40% Win2K Pro and 60 WinXP Pro.
> >
> >I have been asked to attend a meeting. Here is the brief:
> >
> >The idea is to have a complete radical think on our areas of risk (I dont
> >like the term brainstorm but that is may be what it is) so nothing ruled
> in
> >or out. Sample areas of risk could be:-
> >
> >-Computer failure - full or partial - hot start/cold/warm
> >
> >For each risk there will be :-
> >-An event
> >-Magnitude
> >-Probability
> >-Result
> >-Remedy
> >
> >Are there any pointers or docs on the web I can read up to tackle this
> >meeting?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >skc
> >
> >
>
> Damian N. Leibaschoff, MS IST, MCSE
> Microsoft Corporation
>
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>
> =====================================================
>
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via
>
> your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit
>
> from your issue.
>
> =====================================================
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
>
>
.

Relevant Pages

  • RE: Question...
    ... Damian ... >I think it is driving towards disaster recovery. ... >> Security should be on top of your list. ... >> Microsoft Corporation ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Disaster Recovery
    ... disaster recovery plans then they will have back up offices ready equipped. ... This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert ... For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which ...
    (Pen-Test)
  • Disaster Recovery
    ... disaster recovery plans then they will have back up offices ready equipped. ... Thoughts or experiences would be appreciated to help refine my own plans. ... This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert ... For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which ...
    (Pen-Test)
  • RE: Charging customers on security
    ... security", either. ... secure software, or of the good for the data-processing community. ... disaster recovery rather than disaster prevention, ... the frequency and total cost of disaster recovery). ...
    (SecProg)
  • REVIEW: "Disaster Recovery Planning", Jon William Toigo
    ... Toigo's first edition outshone almost all later DRP (Disaster Recovery ... Planning) and BCP works. ... Toigo examines the question of whether people will see this ... perused for problems (such as security), while, at the same time, they ...
    (comp.security.misc)