RE: Question...

Hi,
Security should be on top of your list.

You can find several resources here:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/techinfo/productdoc/default.m
spx

For example:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/f/1/1f15a874-f696-4992-b5ad-b1e7b25
8de1c/SecuringSBSnetwork.doc

Regards,
Damian

--------------------
>Thread-Topic: Question...
>thread-index: AcVQtcd6j9rXAZNHTbyV/OsNQGC9GA==
>X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 83.104.194.213
>From: =?Utf-8?B?U2tj?= <Skc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Question...
>Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 07:30:11 -0700
>Lines: 25
>Message-ID: <258C357A-EB57-4738-93F7-695DCB8ACB29@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="Utf-8"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>Importance: normal
>Priority: normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
>Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:116142
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>
>I am an IT manager for a SBS2003 network with around 50 clients. These
are
>40% Win2K Pro and 60 WinXP Pro.
>
>I have been asked to attend a meeting. Here is the brief:
>
>The idea is to have a complete radical think on our areas of risk (I dont
>like the term brainstorm but that is may be what it is) so nothing ruled
in
>or out. Sample areas of risk could be:-
>
>-Computer failure - full or partial - hot start/cold/warm
>
>For each risk there will be :-
>-An event
>-Magnitude
>-Probability
>-Result
>-Remedy
>
>Are there any pointers or docs on the web I can read up to tackle this
>meeting?
>
>Thanks,
>
>skc
>
>

Damian N. Leibaschoff, MS IST, MCSE
Microsoft Corporation

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via

your newsreader so that others may learn and benefit

from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A 6% fix from Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-040 - 828750
    ... I understand that if you buy an new computer today with Microsoft software, ... > frontier design as enumerated above - not one. ... inside Microsoft would say that adding a feature had a risk associated with ... Anyone who is relying on an AV vendor to *stop* the next Internet ...
    (microsoft.public.security)
  • Re: A 6% fix from Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-040 - 828750
    ... I understand that if you buy an new computer today with Microsoft software, ... > frontier design as enumerated above - not one. ... inside Microsoft would say that adding a feature had a risk associated with ... Anyone who is relying on an AV vendor to *stop* the next Internet ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)
  • Re: A 6% fix from Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-040 - 828750
    ... I understand that if you buy an new computer today with Microsoft software, ... > frontier design as enumerated above - not one. ... inside Microsoft would say that adding a feature had a risk associated with ... Anyone who is relying on an AV vendor to *stop* the next Internet ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: [ANN] "Dbl-Click Wont Open..." Issues
    ... Since the action reduced the risk adequately. ... running on PCs ripped the file type off and threw it away with the ... 13 years ago Microsoft said they did not like ... I don't recall YOUR software ever ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office)
  • Re: A 6% fix from Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-040 - 828750
    ... What I meant by "post" was to the Microsoft security pages. ... > exploiters - as was the case with the RPC hole. ... > are known and the risk of exploit becomes high or manifest. ...
    (microsoft.public.security.virus)