Re: Exchange SP1 or Not?
- From: CCW@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:35:53 GMT
OK, I got Activesync and OMA to work by putting my domain in front of
the username, but I thought that was the purpose of kb843539?
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:56:59 GMT, CCW@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Finally installed exchange SP1. I am having some problems. They seem
>to involve remote access. Remote Activesync is failing with error 29
>on my PocketPC and OMA keeps asking me for a password and finally
>rejects the login (does the same thing when trying to login to OMA
>from client computer).
>I am getting event 529's in my security event log
>My remote access log is showing event 20188.
>I installed kb843539. I ran the remote access wizard.
>kb831464 was installed beforehand.
>I did not install the Active Directory Connector?
>I'm running SBS Standard
>Besides a few pop3 errors, everything was working fine before
>(Murphy's law?).
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:53:47 -0800, "Matt Gibson"
><mattg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Nope.
>>
>>It'll keep all your settings.
>>
>>Matt Gibson - GSEC
>>
>><ccw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:4225eac2.248593687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Now that I have everything working like I want it, if I update to
>>> Exchange SP1, will I be back to square one?
>>
>>
>
.
- References:
- Re: Exchange SP1 or Not?
- From: CCW
- Re: Exchange SP1 or Not?
- Prev by Date: Re: More Traps for Young(ish) Players
- Next by Date: Re: Backing up SBS 2003
- Previous by thread: Re: Exchange SP1 or Not?
- Next by thread: Re: Exchange SP1 or Not?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
