Re: RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
- From: "Marshall Lai" <marshall_lai@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:54:17 +0800
Thanks. That's what I am thinking about except that I would also want
redundancy on the backup drive......
"Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]" <les.connor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message news:%23CvjwmxPFHA.3596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sure, or even an internal IDE drive in this case.
>
> --
> Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> SBS Rocks !
>
>
> "Godfrey Nicholson" <godfrey at ofektech dot com> wrote in message
> news:363C3A60-3C15-449F-AB64-9D1F210282F2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Marshall:
>>
>> Another possibility you might want to consider is to back up onto an
>> external USB drive. It is a cheap, very fast option. I use it
>>
>> Godfrey
>>
>> "Marshall Lai" wrote:
>>
>>> I am contemplating adding some hard disks for backing up my SBS2003
>>> server.
>>> Should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 1?
>>> Any consensus here? The array will be used ONLY for backup and restore
>>> purposes and nothing else.
>>>
>>> Any insight will be much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
.
- References:
- RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
- From: Marshall Lai
- RE: RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
- From: Godfrey Nicholson
- Re: RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
- From: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
- RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
- Prev by Date: Re: RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
- Next by Date: Printing to Local Remote PC when logged on to server remotly
- Previous by thread: Re: RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
- Next by thread: Re: RAID for backup. RAID 5 or RAID 1?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|