Re: Proactive or Reactive service?
From: Rick F (rick.REMOVE_at_rdfts.REMOVE.com)
Date: 03/19/05
- Next message: Chris: "RE: Exchange 2003 text messaging to cell phone refresher"
- Previous message: Steve: "Re: Email is Down"
- In reply to: TK - M/T Box Computers: "Re: Proactive or Reactive service?"
- Next in thread: TK - M/T Box Computers: "Re: Proactive or Reactive service?"
- Reply: TK - M/T Box Computers: "Re: Proactive or Reactive service?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:35:07 -0600
I personally would not include spyware cleanup as this could eat your lunch
unless the prerequisite was to purchase anti-spyware software (not the free
scan on-demand ones...something like CounterSpy). I have spent hours and
hours messing with spyware all because of users that have no concern what
they download and install (none of it ever has a business purpose). And
sometimes having to reformat and install everything back. I think you put
cleanup as a monthly routine, the owner is going to think, big deal about
spyware, Terry is going to clean it up for the same cost that I am already
paying him monthly. You charge him for spyware cleanup, his/her attitude
will change in regards to what their employees on putting on the computers.
What I have done, is have a seminar with all the employees AND BUSINESS
OWNERS to educate them on spyware which surprisingly helps more than you
think. But if a computer has spyware because of the actions of an
irresponsible employee, that is by the hour buddy. :-)
Curious, what were you planning on charging for your service contact to do
this?
-- Rick Faria - MCSE / A+ RDF Technical Services - www.rdfts.com Email: support at rdfts dot com "TK - M/T Box Computers" <terry@removethis.mtboxcomputers.com> wrote in message news:OvwsTY8KFHA.2648@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... > The backup logs and test restores are good, and as you mentioned should be > looked at. I'm comfortable with the AV every 30 days because we have > Trend Micro at all of our SBS sites. Basically this is just a look to > make sure things are still working correctly. If virus activity were to > dramatically go up, we would receive an automatic email letting us know. > > Thanks for you input, and maybe with lots of input it will help all of us > with providing proactive service to our clients (or our own systems for > the business owners out there that monitor this NG). > > -TK > M/T Box Computers > > > <wedor> wrote in message news:uRKG0T8KFHA.2952@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... >> How about testing the back-up by restoring random files and checking the >> logs. I check the back-up logs daily. >> >> I don't know that I would want to wait a month to look at some things >> like A-V, a lot can happen in 30 days if someone's system isn't updating >> properly or the server program isn't functioning correctly >> >> I do updates when they come out, waiting doesn't always seem prudent. >> >> I think proactive is superior but it is difficult to sell to some clients >> as they just can't or won't see the advantage. I had a client who would >> have accused me of wasting their money if I patched for possible >> problems, they had no issue with paying me for emergency calls to fix the >> damage when they got hit by something that could have easily been >> prevented. I also find it easier to prevent than to try to clean up all >> the little odds and ends that keep popping up later if you don't find all >> of the damage right away. >> >> I forget which bug it was but in the summer of 2003 I patched most of my >> clients against a possible bug except the one that would have accused me >> of wasting thier money, they were the only company affected when it hit >> and paid far more to fix it then than they would have if I had patched >> them first, they never even consider the cost of downtime for their own >> employees. >> >> You can lead these people to logic but you can't manke them think. >> >> "TK - M/T Box Computers" <terry@removethis.mtboxcomputers.com> wrote in >> message news:%23w01XF8KFHA.2796@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... >>> I'm working on a proposal for some of our SBS clients that are not >>> currently under a support agreement. In the proposal I want to outline >>> some of the things that should be done on a consistent basis to >>> prevent/avoid small issues becoming major issues. I was curious how >>> many of you simply respond to client issues as they arise, or how many >>> are proactively taking care of the client networks. >>> >>> Ideally I would like to outline some of the services that should be >>> addressed on a monthly basis. Some of the things I've listed are: >>> Daily review of server performance reports and usage reports >>> Monthly service packs/updates/security fixes on the servers and >>> workstations >>> Monthly review of the server AV console (check for patterns, updates are >>> okay, etc.) >>> Monthly checks/updates of antivirus software for all machines >>> Monthly checks/cleanup of spyware / malware / adware for all >>> workstations >>> Software updates and support as-needed (custom software like tax >>> programs, etc.) >>> Hardware maintenance and cleanings (every 6 months, depending on >>> environment) >>> Network security analysis (every 6 months) >>> Intranet & website design and updates (as requested / needed) >>> >>> Is there anything else that some of you are doing that I have not >>> listed? >>> >>> Thanks for your input. >>> >>> -TK >>> M/T Box Computers >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
- Next message: Chris: "RE: Exchange 2003 text messaging to cell phone refresher"
- Previous message: Steve: "Re: Email is Down"
- In reply to: TK - M/T Box Computers: "Re: Proactive or Reactive service?"
- Next in thread: TK - M/T Box Computers: "Re: Proactive or Reactive service?"
- Reply: TK - M/T Box Computers: "Re: Proactive or Reactive service?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|