Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?
From: Hollis D. Paul (Hollis_at_outhousebythesound.com)
Date: 03/19/05
- Next message: Paul: "XPSP2 VPN into SBS2003"
- Previous message: Hollis D. Paul: "Re: My Documents Redirect"
- In reply to: Adam: "Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Next in thread: Joe: "Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Reply: Joe: "Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Reply: Adam: "Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Reply: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:52:59 PST
In article <423bed98$0$527$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net>, Adam
wrote:
> Any thoughts, comments, or suggestions would be very welcome.
>
The downside of going to more sophisticated server services is that you
will lose approximately one man equivalent of your staff to server
management/system capability discovery/system servicing and feeding.
So plan from your staff to increase to 5, and you won't really be able
to talk to that fifth person, because he has rings in his hears, nose,
and navel, studs in his tongues and eyelids, wears his pants below his
***, but is a whiz with computers. Are you up for that?
Hollis D. Paul [MVP - Outlook]
Hollis@outhousebythesound.com
Mukilteo, WA USA
- Next message: Paul: "XPSP2 VPN into SBS2003"
- Previous message: Hollis D. Paul: "Re: My Documents Redirect"
- In reply to: Adam: "Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Next in thread: Joe: "Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Reply: Joe: "Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Reply: Adam: "Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Reply: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]: "Re: Server 2003 or XP for small LAN?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]