Re: Do I need SBS 2003 Standard or Premium?
From: Bill Peng [MSFT] (v-bpeng_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Bill Peng [MSFT]: "Re: Event ID4-Kerberos"
- Previous message: KevinK: "Re: Exchange Problem"
- In reply to: Jim Behning SBS MVP: "Re: Do I need SBS 2003 Standard or Premium?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 01:44:47 GMT
Hi Steve,
I agree with Jim. ISA is not a necessary for VPN connection. Windows Server
2003/SBS built-in RRAS is well enough for VPN connections.
Please refer to the following articles:
Deploying Dial-up and VPN Remote Access Servers
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/all/deploy
guide/en-us/dnsbf_vpn_overview.asp
You can use CEICW to enable VPN on an SBS Server.
If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know.
Bill Peng
MCSE 2000, MCDBA
Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
=====================================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
=====================================================
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
>From: Jim Behning SBS MVP<jimbehingmvp@mindspring.com>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>Subject: Re: Do I need SBS 2003 Standard or Premium?
>Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc.
>Reply-To: jimbehningmvp@mindspring.com
>Message-ID: <bugs215iv09a99g9uvo5rvutvhnikkt6d3@4ax.com>
>References: <B32E9013-95AB-428C-BF8A-C7343FD0093B@microsoft.com>
<j#BD7t7IFHA.1140@TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl>
<03A27908-4AEB-4677-95C6-547008190AC3@microsoft.com>
>X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0510-0, 03/08/2005), Outbound message
>X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
>Lines: 94
>Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:32:06 GMT
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.245.108.112
>X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
>X-Trace: newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net 1110328326 66.245.108.112 (Tue,
08 Mar 2005 16:32:06 PST)
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:32:06 PST
>Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.
sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink
net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread2
news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!57968dc9!not-for-mail
>Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:152503
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>
>VPN has nothing to do with ISA. Two nics are good.
>
>"planetearth" <planetearth@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>Thanks Bill, but I'm a bit confused here. I've set up an SBS2000 server
in
>>the past, and it came with ISA 2000. I used ISA to configure VPN services
and
>>Web access (as a firewall).
>>I'd install a second NIC into this server and use it for Internet access
>>(behind the Linksys router), so I thought I'd need ISA for that.
>>
>>-Steve
>>
>>"Bill Peng [MSFT]" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>> SBS 2003 Premium provide ISA 2000 Standard Edition. SBS 2003 Premium
>>> Service Pack 1, which will be released soon, will provide ISA 2004
Standard
>>> Edition. In your scenario, if you only want to publich FTP sites and
enable
>>> VPN connection, I think SBS Standard version is OK.
>>>
>>> [Note] For VPN connection: please also make sure that from the Router,
GRE
>>> protocol 47 and TCP port 1723 is able to be forwarded to the SBS Server.
>>>
>>> Actually, ISA do provide further features, such as: Client
Authentication,
>>> Web Caching, Bandwidth Rules, Destination Configuration, Monitoring,
>>> Application Filters, etc. If the features are necessary for your
clients, I
>>> recommend you to purchase SBS 2003 Premium.
>>>
>>> For more detail, please check ISA home page:
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/ISAServer
>>>
>>> I hope the above info helps.
>>>
>>> If you have any update, please feel free to post back.
>>>
>>> Bill Peng
>>> MCSE 2000, MCDBA
>>> Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support
>>>
>>> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>>> =====================================================
>>> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
so
>>> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
>>> =====================================================
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
>>>
>>> --------------------
>>> >Thread-Topic: Do I need SBS 2003 Standard or Premium?
>>> >thread-index: AcUjamB/eGh365DkQu+Z9pd8+BnkSQ==
>>> >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 65.103.232.221
>>> >From: "=?Utf-8?B?cGxhbmV0ZWFydGg=?="
>>> <planetearth@discussions.microsoft.com>
>>> >Subject: Do I need SBS 2003 Standard or Premium?
>>> >Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:07:04 -0800
>>> >Lines: 15
>>> >Message-ID: <B32E9013-95AB-428C-BF8A-C7343FD0093B@microsoft.com>
>>> >MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> >Content-Type: text/plain;
>>> > charset="Utf-8"
>>> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>> >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
>>> >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
>>> >Importance: normal
>>> >Priority: normal
>>> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
>>> >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>>> >NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.1.29
>>> >Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
>>> >Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:152139
>>> >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>>> >
>>> >I'm setting up a very small (3-user) office with SBS 2003 for
centralized
>>> >file, print, Internet and fax services (not e-mail). They've already
got a
>>> >basic four-port Linksys router/firewall (with NAT and SPI).
>>> >That said, I was wondering if I need SBS 2003 Premium, with ISA Server
>>> >2000/2004 (or whichever version comes with it--Microsoft's site says
ISA
>>> >Server "2000" comes with SBS 2003 Premium). They *might* eventually
want
>>> to
>>> >go with VPN or FTP services, but no one knows yet.
>>> >I know we'll never need the other stuff that comes with the Premium
>>> version,
>>> >and I'd hate to have to spend three times what the Standard version
costs,
>>> >just to get ISA Server. And as far as I can tell, it's not available
>>> >separately.
>>> >Any thoughts?
>>> >Thanks.
>>> >
>>> >-Steve
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>
>Jim B. SBS MVP
>
- Next message: Bill Peng [MSFT]: "Re: Event ID4-Kerberos"
- Previous message: KevinK: "Re: Exchange Problem"
- In reply to: Jim Behning SBS MVP: "Re: Do I need SBS 2003 Standard or Premium?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|