Re: Hotdesking and performance questions with SBS.

From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP] (not_at_your.nellie)
Date: 02/28/05


Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:54:37 +1100


*Hotdesking - you need to research 'roaming profiles' (the old way) or
'folder redirection' (newer). Roaming profiles works well if all worstations
which a user logs onto have all applications which the user accesses
installed. It can be problematic if there are different versions or update
status on the WS's. Folder Redirection is cleaner.

*Performance - I would expect a basic Dell server to be more than sufficient
for 10 users. I prefer SCSI based systems but some of the entry level Dells
use SATA. SATA drives are, for the most part, not designed for 24*7
operation. SOME SATA drives are basically SCSI drives with SATA interfaces,
look for drives with 36/72GB capacity vs 40/80, the SCSI-like drives will
also have quicker specs and longer MTBF figures. TTBOMK Dell will not supply
such drives in the basic SATA configs. Any current CPU should suffice. Give
it 2GB RAM.

It's a server, it also needs:
RAID (1 or 5)
Backup, I suggest SCSI DDS minimum, some people don't like DDS and depending
on capacity you may do well to go to LTO, DLT or better.
UPS.

<Gregory.Spencer@lycos.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1109557271.627104.22230@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> My recent crash course in SBS has left my brain hot but I like it.
> However 2 areas where I have questions:
>
> * Hotdesking - Assuming staff in office have 5 CAL licences, when they
> come in to the office, can they go to use any PC they like and log in
> without any performance impact. Maybe I ask this because I am still in
> the mindset of having all the files stored locally on a particular PC.
> If they later go to another PC in the office, all of their fiels etc,
> will have to be downloaded.
>
> Can anyone clarify my understanding here? Is it faster for a user to
> stick to the same PC, or is there only an intial slowdown while files
> are retrevied? Does this truly create an environment where they really
> can swap PC's and pickup from where they left off?
>
> * Performance - assuming they can hot desk in a way described above
> that actually works effectively, is there not a huge impact in
> performance on the server? I was thinking of buying an entry level Dell
> server for SBS which would be supporting up to 10 users, but suddenly
> I'm thinking, they are going to notice a big performance drop when
> compared to their current individual PC setup.
> What solutions are there in place to address performance issues and do
> I actually need to go for a big expensive server?
>
> Kind regards
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: SYSTEM DISK FREEZES WITH HEAVY IO ON DISK
    ... from PATA to SATA in my home office server with SBS 2003 SP1. ... and installed a single SATA drive on the motherboard SATA ... I now have an Adaptec RAID controller and two SATA drives, ... With servers a re-install is a major task -- and I would assume Microsoft ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: ????SATA or SCSI????
    ... it may have been perceived as a major failure if it had been SATA that you ... I haven't yet deployed a server ... Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP] ... If the drives had been SATA and one had failed in a week, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SATA drives...
    ... as a subsitute for SCSI. ... for the investment of a new server, OS, backup system, etc. ... relative risk of the lower-cost SATA. ... > SCSI drives are designed for servers running 24*7. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: SCSI vs. SATA IDE
    ... I"ve been using the same SATA config in 15-16 servers now for about a year. ... This makes for a total of 7 drives running at a time. ... My personal server is setup like this. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: eSATA support
    ... SATA drive: a harddrive that uses the SATA interface. ... It has these maddingly easy to break off data cable connector. ... most prevalent of all the SATA drives in the market. ... eSATA connector is different. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)

Loading