Re: SBS and VPN
From: Anon (invalid_at_invalid.invalid)
Date: 02/21/05
- Next message: Adrian Ciuca: "Re: Creating a hardware RAID 1 array with existing SBS2k3 Installation"
- Previous message: Anon: "Re: SBS and VPN"
- In reply to: Matt Gibson: "Re: SBS and VPN"
- Next in thread: Matt Gibson: "Re: SBS and VPN"
- Reply: Matt Gibson: "Re: SBS and VPN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:19:07 +0100
> You didn't ask that. You asked if DNS had to be done by the SBS server, and
> I told you.
I think we're not talking "on the same wavelength". I completely agree
that DNS has to be handled by the SBS, I just pointed out that one could
terminate the VPN-connection in the Cisco-box and still use the DNS of
the SBS. But as I understand you, it requires DHCP served from the SBS
in order to register older clients, which I do not know whether is
possible from the Cisco (although I strongly assume).
So I think we basically technically agree, but just mistunderstand each
other?
>>No, that's just a question of setting the DNS-suffix. Windows machines
>>will then pr. default try to register in the DNS.
> Only 2K and above. Anything else will not.
Thanks - didn't think of that.
Anon
PS: Please don't regard all these posts as a flamewar as sam1967
suggested - I just wanted to sched some light on the subject. :-)
- Next message: Adrian Ciuca: "Re: Creating a hardware RAID 1 array with existing SBS2k3 Installation"
- Previous message: Anon: "Re: SBS and VPN"
- In reply to: Matt Gibson: "Re: SBS and VPN"
- Next in thread: Matt Gibson: "Re: SBS and VPN"
- Reply: Matt Gibson: "Re: SBS and VPN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|