Re: Can you have a BDC in SBS2003?
From: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP] (les.connor_at_DEL.cfive.ca)
Date: 02/20/05
- Next message: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]: "Re: Remote web workplace won't work"
- Previous message: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: Remote web workplace won't work"
- In reply to: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: Can you have a BDC in SBS2003?"
- Next in thread: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: Can you have a BDC in SBS2003?"
- Reply: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: Can you have a BDC in SBS2003?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:22:48 -0600
ok.
But Eric wants 2k3 servers at the remote sites.
-- Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP] ----------------------------------------------------------- SBS Rocks ! "SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message news:%23plOzkvFFHA.3972@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > careful how you interpret it. I'm just doing an experiment now. > > The pedant in me suggests: > You cannot have BDC's in an SBS2003 AD whereas you can in a vanilla 2003 > AD. > You can have as many PEER DC's in an SBS2003 AD as you like and are able > to supply device type CALs for. > > I've just gotta check that I'm right. > > How many NT4 Servers are you running? > > "Eric" <Eric@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:81BC0FF6-2411-47B1-990E-E9A0D8A93EE1@microsoft.com... >> Thanks a ton Les, I REALLY appreciate it! >> >> Eric >> >> "Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS M" wrote: >> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> PDC/BDC aren't relevant terms anymore, but I know what you mean ;-). >>> >>> It's a common misconception that you can't have additional domain >>> controllers in an SBS environment. You can have as many domain >>> controllers >>> as you like, but the SBS must be the DC at the root of the domain, and >>> hold >>> all of the FSMO roles. >>> >>> So, if you want a main site with SBS2k or 2k3, and remote sites with >>> Windows >>> 2k or 2k3, and you want the remote servers to be domain controllers - >>> you go >>> right ahead. As a side benefit, the servers at the remote sites will use >>> one >>> SBS CAL each, but access to these servers by workstations is covered by >>> the >>> SBS2k CALs ;-). >>> >>> -- >>> Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP] >>> ----------------------------------------------------------- >>> SBS Rocks ! >>> >>> >>> "Eric" <Eric@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >>> news:6C905047-A71E-45DA-9C02-7B33DD34250E@microsoft.com... >>> >I have a main site, and 2 remote sites, all with servers connected via >>> >VPN. >>> > Each site has a cache server that is also a BDC on the domain. Right >>> > now, >>> > they are all win2k servers. >>> > >>> > My question is this: Can I have a SBS2003 server at the main site, >>> > and >>> > have >>> > server 2003 boxes at the remote sites that can act as BDC/cache >>> > servers? >>> > I >>> > know that SBS2000 would not allow anymore that one domain controller, >>> > is >>> > SBS2003 the same? >>> > >>> > Any other suggestions on the best way to upgrade and connect all sites >>> > would >>> > be appreciated. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Eric >>> >>> >>> > >
- Next message: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]: "Re: Remote web workplace won't work"
- Previous message: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]: "Re: Remote web workplace won't work"
- In reply to: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: Can you have a BDC in SBS2003?"
- Next in thread: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: Can you have a BDC in SBS2003?"
- Reply: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: Can you have a BDC in SBS2003?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|