Re: VOIP
From: David Elders (david_elders_at_hotmail.com.nospam)
Date: 02/15/05
- Next message: TimM: "Fax email Notification"
- Previous message: Steve: "Re: Global Address Lists???"
- In reply to: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: VOIP"
- Next in thread: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: VOIP"
- Reply: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: VOIP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:37:18 -0000
Hi Javier,
Using compression brings calls down to about 20k including overhead so
unless you have something really leaning on a 100Mb network you're not going
to have anything that affects it adversely, given that the IP phones are
communicating directly with the PBX. Echo cancellation also helps maximise
the available bandwidth for VoIP.
>From the Avaya documentation:
"For those customers who are willing to upgrade their data network, the
ultimate scenario for Voice would be for every device on the Local Area
Network to have its own dedicated port on a DiffServ capable layer 3 switch
such as the Avaya Cajun. Connections to the Wide Area Network should, once
again, be via devices supporting DiffServ such as the IP Office."
The IP Office range does not currently support SIP.
The central reason we opted to get involved with the IP Office range was
specifically its CTI integration and the fact that its squarely aimed at the
same core market as SBS - the SME market.
Anyway, I'll sign off now in case anyone feels I'm giving a sales speech!
Cheers,
David
"Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]" <javier_gomez@remove.this.engineer.com> wrote in
message news:OnakcC2EFHA.2540@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> David,
>
> I'm curious (as I have just started to work with VoIP solutions)-> Do you
> anything to separate the traffic? I mean to optimize or give the SIP
> traffic priority?
>
> --
> Javier [SBS MVP]
> www.msmvps.com/javier
> << SBS ROCKS !!! >>
>
> "David Elders" <david_elders@hotmail.com.nospam> wrote in message
> news:%238JW1K1EFHA.3504@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> Hi Mariette,
>>
>> I have to disagree.
>>
>> We're VARs for IP Office and have this working on many customer sites,
>> some with SBS. That said, we'd always recommend having the PCs and IP
>> Phones on individual ports on the network switch as opposed to using the
>> option of linking the PCs through the phones to save on network points -
>> more from a simplicity point of view for any support issues than for any
>> operational problems. Properly configured, there is no need to have
>> entirely separate networks for IP Phones and the PCs...
>>
>> Again, that's why we prefer fixed IP addressing for IP Phones in that it
>> makes support a lot easier in that it saves time with addressing what IP
>> address matches which phone.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: TimM: "Fax email Notification"
- Previous message: Steve: "Re: Global Address Lists???"
- In reply to: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: VOIP"
- Next in thread: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: VOIP"
- Reply: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: VOIP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|