Re: Performance Issues: Network Load Balancing?
From: SuperGumby [SBS MVP] (not_at_your.nellie)
Date: 02/03/05
- Next message: Maurice Bishop: "NTBackup scheduler failure"
- Previous message: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]: "Re: Remote Web Workplace Partially Works"
- In reply to: Steve: "Re: Performance Issues: Network Load Balancing?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:57:24 +1100
it is unusual but not prohibited to run a WAN in a single subnet.
You might suggest to your comms guy that he consider running the WAN as a
number of routed subnets.
Oh, to hell with being judicious. Get your comms guy back in and tell him to
fix it.
He has your HQ network at 10.0.0.0/8 and the remote at 10.10.3.0/24.
The two networks believe they are independent networks of a different class.
eg. the network address at HQ is 10.0.0.0, the broadcast address is
10.255.255.255. The remote LAN's network address is 10.10.3.0 (which is a
host address at HQ) and the broadcast address is 10.10.3.255 (also a host
address at HQ)
You don't happen to be in Sydney Australia, do you?
"Steve" <Steve@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9C004125-BD89-4C3E-9CE5-EC39359A53F7@microsoft.com...
> Thanks again for the quick response.
>
> I read the articles about Auto-Sensing and have made those settings a
> while
> back.
> Historically, not with this company and configuration, I have had problems
> with Ethernet adapters unless I configured them all at 100/Full Duplex.
>
> I would play around with the SUBNET, but they are configured in the
> routers
> and firebox and the configuration of those are outsourced to a specialist
> who
> claims that they are configured properly. I just spent another $500, on
> Monday, to have him come out and spend an hour checking them out. The
> SUBNET
> is not configured on the SBS server. The WAN clients appear to be on the
> same
> network. Initially, I did have a problem accessing them via the Browser
> and
> Search, but that was a client firewall issue which was resolved using the
> Group Policy.
>
>
> "Jim Behning SBS MVP" wrote:
>
>> That subnet is odd but other than that is looks ok. If you mask at
>> 255.255.255.0 you have 254 hosts. More than enough for a traditional
>> SBS network. You may try changing that just for fun.
>>
>> Look in your DNS and WINS for wierd entries. You should only see
>> internal network enties for the most part.
>>
>> I let my SBS handle dhcp. It would not have done the subnet mask you
>> have. It also would have started serving ips starting at .10 Probably
>> still not relevant.
>>
>> I have had issues with some servers if you manually set the nic speed.
>> I have seen about gazzilion percent increase in speed when the nic is
>> set to auto. 5 minute file transfers taking 5 seconds or less when the
>> nic is set to auto. Once again probably not relevant.
>>
>> I still vote for subnet mask.
>>
>> "Steve" <Steve@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Thanks for the response.
>> >
>> >Yes, The server and all workstations are patched with the latest
>> >updates,
>> >including Sharepoint/SP1 and Exchange/SP1, plus anything else I could
>> >find.
>> >MBSA reports that all is well.
>> >
>> >Server is a Gateway 6400 with dual PIII/1000 and 1GB Memory.
>> >
>> >IPCONFIG/ALL - SERVER/DOMAIN CONTROLLER
>> >
>> >Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790]
>> >(C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.
>> >
>> >C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ipconfig/all
>> >
>> >Windows IP Configuration
>> >
>> > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : pflserver
>> > Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : PetFoodLtd.local
>> > Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
>> > IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>> > WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>> > DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : PetFoodLtd.local
>> >
>> >Ethernet adapter Server Local Area Connection:
>> >
>> > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
>> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) 82559 Fast Ethernet LAN
>> > on
>> >Mothe
>> >rboard
>> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-E0-18-CF-3A-C2
>> > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>> > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.2
>> > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.0.0.0
>> > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.1
>> > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.2
>> > Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.2
>> >
>> >IPCONFIG/ALL - LAN CLIENT - Sluggish Exchange - No other performance
>> >issues.
>> >P4 2.0 with 512mb Rambus. There are 20 LAN Clients.
>> >
>> >Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
>> >(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
>> >
>> >C:\Documents and Settings\steve>ipconfig/all
>> >
>> >Windows IP Configuration
>> >
>> > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : STEVE
>> > Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : PetFoodLtd.local
>> > Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
>> > IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>> > WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>> > DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : PetFoodLtd.local
>> > PetFoodLtd.local
>> >
>> >Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
>> >
>> > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : PetFoodLtd.local
>> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Desktop
>> >Adapter
>> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-02-B3-20-75-3E
>> > Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
>> > Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
>> > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.4
>> > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.0.0.0
>> > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.1
>> > DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.2
>> > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.2
>> > Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.2
>> > Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Tuesday, February 01, 2005
>> >8:28:16 A
>> >M
>> > Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, February 09, 2005
>> >8:28:16
>> > AM
>> >
>> >C:\Documents and Settings\steve>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >IPCONFIG/ALL - WAN Client - Fixed IP Address - Connects via Cisco
>> >Routers
>> >and Firebox. All WINS and DNS entries appear normal. Sluggish Exchange,
>> >too
>> >often very sluggish or non-responsive. No other performance or network
>> >issues. P4 1.8 w/256mb SDRAM. There are five WAN Clients.
>> >
>> >
>> >Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
>> >(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
>> >
>> >C:\Documents and Settings\synda.PETFOODLTD.000>ipconfig/all
>> >
>> >Windows IP Configuration
>> >
>> > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : SYNDA
>> > Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : PetFoodLtd.local
>> > Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
>> > IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>> > WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
>> > DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : PetFoodLtd.local
>> >
>> >Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 3:
>> >
>> > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
>> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Linksys LNE100TX Fast
>> > Ethernet
>> >Adapt
>> >er(LNE100TX v4)
>> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-41-1C-4E-1B
>> > Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
>> > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.3.165
>> > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
>> > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.3.251
>> > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.2
>> > Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.10.1.2
>> >
>> >C:\Documents and Settings\synda.PETFOODLTD.000>
>> >
>> >Thanks for any advice.
>> >
>> >
>> >"Jim Behning SBS MVP" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is your server totally up to date with Windows Updates and all the
>> >> patches on the SBS2003 website?
>> >>
>> >> The other thing to do is list the ipconfig/all from the server and a
>> >> workstation. I don't recall ever seeing a slow Outlook unless the
>> >> whole server was slow.
>> >>
>> >> "Steve" <Steve@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >It looks like my sbs2003 std, w/exchange and sharepoint, is up and
>> >> >running,
>> >> >resolved most issues including the time service, thanks mainly to
>> >> >this
>> >> >discussion group.
>> >> >
>> >> >Exchange clients are still very slow or non-responsive. Most other
>> >> >services
>> >> >perform well, like Sharepoint Intranet and internet access.
>> >> >
>> >> >Some users are using the Intranet/companyweb to access their email,
>> >> >which is
>> >> >very fast, but that is not my preference. I would prefer them to use
>> >> >Outlook
>> >> >caching so that I can re-create individual PST files if I had to for
>> >> >any
>> >> >reason.
>> >> >
>> >> >sbs 2003 installed a 'Network Load Balancing' Service under network
>> >> >adapter
>> >> >properties, but did not mark it to run. Should this service be
>> >> >running?
>> >> >
>> >> >QOS Packet Scheduler is running on the server and all workstations.
>> >> >
>> >> >We have one server, with one NIC, a Firebox and 25 XP/SP2 clients.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Jim B. SBS Community Member
>> >> remove the mvp to send email
>> >>
>>
>> Jim B. SBS Community Member
>> remove the mvp to send email
>>
- Next message: Maurice Bishop: "NTBackup scheduler failure"
- Previous message: Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]: "Re: Remote Web Workplace Partially Works"
- In reply to: Steve: "Re: Performance Issues: Network Load Balancing?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|