Re: RWW interal not external

From: Clay Gerrard (clayg_at_gvtc.com)
Date: 01/17/05 

Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:30:24 -0600

when I ran the CEICW it asked for the FQDN and it was my understanding that
the certificate is created at that time, is there something more that I need
to do manually because this is the first I heard of it.

But if I'm understanding you correctly only the address I specified will
work correctly i.e. https://[FQDN]/remote

also, I have already tried https vs http, same results

-clay

THANKS!

"Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]" <les.connor@DEL.cfive.ca>
wrote in message news:u8B$%23qL$EHA.1188@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi Clay,
>
> Your server certificate will have been created with the name [fqdn] *or*
> [external_IP], so you must use whichever when you type the URL from a
> remote location.
>
> Additionally, sometimes the HTTPS re-direct is the culprit - so try
> https:// instead of http://, and see if that makes any difference.
>
> --
> Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP]
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> SBS Rocks !
>
>
> "Clay Gerrard" <clayg@gvtc.com> wrote in message
> news:uYUaahL$EHA.2156@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> I'm forwarding:
>> 443, 444, 4125, 1723, 3389, 80
>>
>> internally http://[internal_ip]/remote or http://[servername]/remote work
>> great.
>>
>> externally, I can't reach http://FQDN/remote or
>> http://[external_ip]/remote
>>
>> is there a good way to verify that ports are being forwarded to the
>> server and elimiate the router as an issue? Port 25 is being forwarded
>> through the router just fine for SMTP, I can verify that with telnet from
>> an external shell account.
>>
>> I've seen serveral posts on this issue, but it seems folks rarely post
>> back the results. If we figure this out I promise I'll let you know what
>> the resolution was.
>>
>> Ok so, where do we start?
>>
>> -clay
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Castle What?
    ... active, Antivirus, Malware monitor, and it connects through a Nat enabled ... Router. ... I hope you have a good understanding of the ways that Trojans and ...
    (comp.sys.acorn.misc)
  • RE: [opensuse] Need Router Recommendation
    ... booted and connected to the router, so any of those 3 should work, ... but maybe I'm still not understanding it correctly. ... The "fsck running amok" thread that I started ended ... To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: [fw-wiz] Cisco acls
    ... >As long as you don't leave configure mode, it is my understanding that the ... >change is not acted upon by the router. ... So, copying a router's access-list ... ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN ...
    (Firewall-Wizards)
  • Re: [opensuse] Need Router Recommendation
    ... booted and connected to the router, so any of those 3 should work, meaning ... just leaving it as the default "Use Default Mac Address" is all I think I ... Sounds like you are understanding it perfectly. ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: opening ports & i feel dumb
    ... > recently switched to debian after years with windows, i am enjoying ... > my current dilemma is with ports: ... > understanding them, and working with them ...
    (Debian-User)