Re: SMB or NBT issues on VPN
From: Mike (mike008us_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/28/04
- Next message: *** Miller: "Compressed NTFS Drive"
- Previous message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Network Drive connection issues"
- In reply to: SlowJet: "Re: SMB or NBT issues on VPN"
- Next in thread: Malke: "Re: SMB or NBT issues on VPN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 20:34:26 -0600
I don't want to run WINS for WinXP and that should not be necessary. The
other 3 branch offices connect via a 1/2 T1 and that is the only difference.
Sure the T1 connectected branches have less latency, 768k bandwidth(vs 1MB+
with DSL), but the VPN connected branch should be able to browse via SMB or
NBT seeing how other IP traffic works without issue.
I'm convinced this can be fixed by adjusting something that affects the way
the Windows machine browses to the server. Maybe it's an MTU on a DSL
modem, maybe a TCP window size on the server and VPN connected PCs. I'm
sure someone else knows the fix here.
Please help!
Thanks,
Mike
"SlowJet" <SlowJet@noTY2this.com> wrote in message
news:Ps0Ad.18196$_62.11260@trnddc01...
> Could a WINS sever help for file print sharing?
> Put the names in local host, too.
>
> I'm having a same catagory problem between Linux and XP PRO.
> It wants a WINS sever secive but I don't have a sever?
> I don't know how to do that in PRO or Linux, for that matter, but it s/b a
> snap on a W23k server.
>
> SJ
>
>
> "Mike" <mike008us@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:eY70DvC7EHA.2012@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a customer that I setup a SBS 2003 server. 3 branch offices have
>> either 1/2 or full P2P T1's and there are no problems here. One other
>> branch I setup with a site to site VPN using Sonicwall. Everything (VNC,
>> Outlook via Exchange server, terminal
>> emulator connecting to server, pretty much all IP apps) work great,
>> EXCEPT
>> anything dependent on windows browsing. The PC at this branch is
>> WinXP(just
>> upgraded to SP2, with no resolve). I copied a 2.5 MB file from the
>> server
>> to the PC in 48 seconds so it partially works(and this proves the
>> internet
>> connections at each side of the VPN are fine).
>>
>> I know XP and 2003/AD are very dependent on DNS for browsing, however I'm
>> sure everything is setup properly. Both server and this PC have only the
>> server for DNS servers, the internal domain is listed for a suffix for
>> both,
>> I have a reverse zone setup for this(and all)network which the PC is
>> registering itself in.
>>
>> When I do a packet sniff on this PC I see an excess of port 445
>> traffic(see
>> sample below) to the point where I think the PC is trying to resolve and
>> that's what the big delays are when you go to access network shares or do
>> a
>> File>Open in Word(which has My Docs as Document dir and My Docs is
>> redirected to user folder via group policy).
>>
>> An interesting thing is I've tried disabling the XP machine from using
>> NBT(137-139) and the problem continues as it was. However, if I disable
>> SMB(445) I saw no NBT traffic on the sniffer and no browsing worked(this
>> is with NBT enabled). Something on the PC is not allowing NBT to even
>> send packets out maybe or at least try because I'd expect to at least see
>> 137-139 packets outbound from the PC even if they didn't make it accross
>> the VPN.
>>
>> Please help. Is there a way to tell this PC to not try to resolve
>> whatever
>> way it's attempting when these delays occur? Like I said the other 3
>> branches connecting via T1s work fine and this branch works fine accross
>> the
>> VPN for all other IP applications.
>>
>> ---sample of packet sniffing----
>> ------------ Item: 1 ------------>
>> TCP 144 192.168.1.240 192.168.6.11 58403 445 2:52:58.190 PM,
>> 11-30-2004
>>
>> Euq@ #¡75|POϡdSMB
>> Y@@
>> \wkssvc
>>
>> ------------ Item: 2 ------------>
>> TCP 179 192.168.6.11 192.168.1.240 445 58403 2:52:58.190 PM,
>> 11-30-2004
>>
>> E@?qI #75|¡kP+T$?SMB~
>> *??
>> >
>>
>> ------------ Item: 3 ------------>
>> TCP 180 192.168.1.240 192.168.6.11 58403 445 2:52:58.268 PM,
>> 11-30-2004
>>
>> E_=@ #¡k76P~"^SMB/
>> HH@I H
>> ~k6~3F~4Z]^SY+H`
>>
>> ------------ Item: 4 ------------>
>> TCP 91 192.168.6.11 192.168.1.240 445 58403 2:52:58.284 PM,
>> 11-30-2004
>>
>> E[@?q #76¡PYS/SMB/~
>> /H
>>
>> ------------ Item: 5 ------------>
>> TCP 103 192.168.1.240 192.168.6.11 58403 445 2:52:58.346 PM,
>> 11-30-2004
>>
>> Egr]@ #¡76:P'f(;SMB.
>>
>>
>> ------------ Item: 6 ------------>
>> TCP 172 192.168.6.11 192.168.1.240 445 58403 2:52:58.346 PM,
>> 11-30-2004
>>
>> E@?qN #76:¡6P`R?SMB.~
>> D<E Dty
>>
>> \PIPE\wkssvc
>>
>> ---end of sample---
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
- Next message: *** Miller: "Compressed NTFS Drive"
- Previous message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Network Drive connection issues"
- In reply to: SlowJet: "Re: SMB or NBT issues on VPN"
- Next in thread: Malke: "Re: SMB or NBT issues on VPN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]