Re: antivirus
From: Les Connor [SBS Community Member] (les.connor_at_DEL.cfive.ca)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: R D Black: "Re: Creating users Template or not"
- Previous message: David Copeland [MSFT]: "Re: Move SBS Monitoring and Sharepoint to SQL Server"
- In reply to: Allan Sabiski: "Re: antivirus"
- Next in thread: JT: "Re: antivirus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:05:01 -0600
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5497273.html
Hotmail dumps McAfee's antivirus for Trend Micro
-- Les Connor [SBS Community Member] ----------------------------------------------------------- SBS Rocks ! "Allan Sabiski" <allansNOSPAMPLEASE@ics-limited.com> wrote in message news:%23cMnjGr5EHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > I'd second Frank's suggestion for Trendmicro's Client /Server Messaging > Suite. > > My ISP uses AppRiver to pull out Spam and virus's (or is it virii) but > occasionally spam and a virus does get thru. When that happpens > trendmicro > picks it off. > > When I investigated my ISP's usage of AppRiver, the problem had to do with > the fact that my isp had not locked submission for my domain to only the > AppRiver servers. So I get a real good price, but TrendMicro is needed to > pick off a few spam messages and a rare occasional virus. > > The only downside is that I have not found a way for endusers to pick thru > their own Spam in the TrendMicro product. Something I can live with if I > have to. > > I have not had a virus get thru both layers. > Allan > "Frank McCallister SBS MVP" <anonymous> wrote in message > news:ut$sVJR5EHA.1120@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... >> Hi JT >> >> I recommend Trendmicro CSM suite. If you prefer to use Norton on the WS > then >> use NAV Corporate suite for Small busuiness but that is more expensive. >> >> -- >> Frank McCallister SBS MVP >> COMPUMAC >> "JT" <jdteel@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:%236QE%23eQ5EHA.936@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >> > Thanks for everyone's input on this. I like to get a good cross section > of >> > views from people who "have been there". I agree that layered >> > protection >> > is good and that is what I have done with my current set-up by scanning >> > with Norton on my local PC as well as having the scanning that my ISP > does >> > as a part of my Internet package. I also know that not all ISP's are >> > created equal and I have a very high confidence in mine because they >> > are > a >> > local company and I know where to find them if I need them or have a >> > problem with something. I also know that no ISP is perfect so don't > think >> > I'm saying that those who have responded don't know what your are > talking >> > about. I will be looking in to some kind of protection. Does anyone >> > have >> > any advice for a product that you use?? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > >> > "Nic" <Nic@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> > news:2905788E-4EAB-4BD4-BA09-78C64436CA8C@microsoft.com... >> >> Suicide !! >> >> If you do not protect the server especially using POP3 and the ISP is >> >> protecting the account !! ISP's small print states they are not held >> >> responsible for anything that may get through, have seen this many > times >> >> !! >> >> >> >> "JT" wrote: >> >> >> >>> I have a question regarding the comments made here about having AV >> >>> protection on the Exchange Server. Would it still be as important to >> >>> have >> >>> that protection if you were getting mail from a POP3 connection that > had >> >>> AV >> >>> protection on it. My Internet provider scans my mail (incoming and >> >>> outgoing) >> >>> before it is placed in my mailbox as a part of my service package. I >> >>> will >> >>> not be hosting mail on my server directly. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> >> >>> "David Elders" <david_elders@hotmail.com.nospam> wrote in message >> >>> news:uM0WUOE5EHA.3596@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >> >>> >I wouldn't say you're asking for trouble, I'd say you're positively >> >>> >pleading for it! Get that Server protected sharpish. Server houses > your >> >>> >network's important data right? Your email, right? Seriously - get > both >> >>> >a >> >>> >real-time file scanner and an Exchange-aware email scanner on there >> >>> >ASAP or >> >>> >be prepared for the potential consequences. I don't mean to sound > scary >> >>> >with this but I'd be lying if I said it wasn't the first thing I > stick >> >>> >on >> >>> >any new server... >> >>> > >> >>> > Lots of options with regards what AV to use - if you already have >> >>> > something you're comfy with, investigate that company's server >> >>> > offerings >> >>> > [if any], if not have a look at the main players out there. I >> >>> > myself >> >>> > only >> >>> > have experience with the Trend suite but have to say am VERY happy >> >>> > with >> >>> > it. 3 years and not a single virus infection in our office. To me, > the >> >>> > time for cleaning up only a single infection in that period would > have >> >>> > far >> >>> > outweighed the very reasonable cost to protect the Server along >> >>> > with >> >>> > our >> >>> > network for that timeframe... >> >>> > >> >>> > Cheers, >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > David >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > "Geoff Dutch" <GeoffDutch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > message >> >>> > news:2DFCD847-A47F-4E32-9DF1-565B61904D92@microsoft.com... >> >>> >> Wouldn't say asking for trouble ! Would suggest a anti-virus for > the >> >>> >> Exchange server. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> "Gus" wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Dont use any on SBS server, am I asking for trouble all clients > have >> >>> >>> it. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > >> > >> >> > >
- Next message: R D Black: "Re: Creating users Template or not"
- Previous message: David Copeland [MSFT]: "Re: Move SBS Monitoring and Sharepoint to SQL Server"
- In reply to: Allan Sabiski: "Re: antivirus"
- Next in thread: JT: "Re: antivirus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
