Re: An argument AGAINST hosting your own email domain.
From: Olaf Rohleder (news.nospam.group_at_olafrohleder.de)
Date: 12/06/04
- Next message: Raj: "Re: HTTP Virtual Server/OWA default web site"
- Previous message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: best solution"
- In reply to: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "An argument AGAINST hosting your own email domain."
- Next in thread: MTBoxTech: "Re: An argument AGAINST hosting your own email domain."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:52:17 +0100
Hi SuperGumby
SuperGumby [SBS MVP] wrote:
> but you're allowed to argue the 'for'.
> individual mailbox and assign it to an Exchange mailbox works, we
[Removed]
> We can still pull the mail into Exchange, AV and SPAM check it
> before
> it gets to the user, give them our own web interface via OWA, bells
> whistles, full kit and kaboodle.
I have to give you an ACK, but see more below.
> imterested in your thoughts.
> TIA
> mm
You have a point here.
But i have a Problem with _any_ POP-Connector, because I've seen too
much trouble with all of them (that i have tried).
I prefer another solution; it's a pity very few providers do it.
The Provider holds the MX, does AV-Filtering and SPAM Reduction with a
Spam filter and DNS-Blacklists - no great thing until here...
But then the Mails do not get pushed to POP-Boxes - they're queued
into a SMTP - Queue and the Customer's Exchange (or other Mailserver)
can dequeue them via SMTP (only authenticated!).
That's what I call service....
Just my 2 Cent...
CU, Olaf
- Next message: Raj: "Re: HTTP Virtual Server/OWA default web site"
- Previous message: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: best solution"
- In reply to: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "An argument AGAINST hosting your own email domain."
- Next in thread: MTBoxTech: "Re: An argument AGAINST hosting your own email domain."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|