Re: 12 companies - one sbs server
From: ChrisS (ChrisR_at_nospam.com)
Date: 11/11/04
- Next message: Robbo: "Re: SBS 2003 re configure"
- Previous message: Steve: "Date Format Incoming Faxes on CopmpanyWeb"
- In reply to: Bill Swan: "Re: 12 companies - one sbs server"
- Next in thread: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: 12 companies - one sbs server"
- Reply: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: 12 companies - one sbs server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:03:59 -0000
Thank you but...
Looks like a MICROSOFT website.
Totally bias towards SBS2003
NOT very useful - and a damn insult to anyone with ANY intelligence!
Even the little I've managed to RESEARCH (not dream up as in the link) in
the last 20 hours
Yes, I thought it was worth looking up.
Current Product is Novell Small Business - available BEFORE MS SBS2003 went
to market
so no excuse for the FUD tactics.
Very little about the Novell seems to be true and the MS stuff is hyped up.
"Bill Swan" <bill@nospamfirstresponseit.co.uk> wrote in message
news:einYW53xEHA.2600@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi Chris, these notes will give some info:-
>
> http://www.sbslinks.com/Us_v_Novell.htm
>
> http://www.smallbizserver.net/Default.aspx?tabid=77
>
> You sure you want to look after 12 companies on 1 server ???? Biggest
issues
> in any setup (Novell or SBS) I can see are the ' remote access ' benefits
of
> current software...you are gonna have a nightmare administration wise to
> maintain. Off the cuff you are going to have to split any server into 12
> parts....Im getting a headache thinging about it...Nice challenge
though...
> Are you going to be on site during all working hours. Server goes down all
> are affected ?
>
>
> --
> www.smallbizserver.net (2000 and 2003)
>
> microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000 (2000 NG)
>
> microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs (2003 NG)
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000
>
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&group=microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>
> http://www.sbslinks.com/
>
> "ChrisS" <ChrisR@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:ukhMQa3xEHA.2752@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >I have a project - we just acquired a new office block
> > There are 12 units and we hope to provide Internet access
> > and mail (and ofcause file & print) for these small companies.
> > The total number of users is below 40
> > (some these companies only have 2-3 users)
> >
> > I want to put a SBS2003 server but the Group's IT people
> > tell me this would not be possible with SBS 2003 and are suggesting
> > I should consider a Novell Small Business Server with Groupwise.
> > Novell SBS will allow upto 100 users rather than SBS2003's 50.
> > Groupwise will support as many domains and post offices I require.
> >
> > Whilst I see the benefits of PO for different companies
> > all I really need is to be able to create Groups for each company
> > and assign the relevent .co.uk or .com domains to these users.
> >
> > I'm told and see postings in this group that suggest that SBS cannot
> > handle multiple "email domains" properly... is this true ??
> >
> > I also have a tight budget of £ 10K for Server with at least 400Gb RAID
5
> > storage, Tape Backup, SBS 2003 License, Router and cabling!!
> >
> > Any info / ideas welcome.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Robbo: "Re: SBS 2003 re configure"
- Previous message: Steve: "Date Format Incoming Faxes on CopmpanyWeb"
- In reply to: Bill Swan: "Re: 12 companies - one sbs server"
- Next in thread: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: 12 companies - one sbs server"
- Reply: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: 12 companies - one sbs server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|