Re: "You can never have too much RAM ..........."

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

From: Les Connor (les.connor_at_DEL.cfive.ca)
Date: 10/08/04


Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:46:57 -0500

I hear you SuperGrumpy, and actually I mostly agree.

There is a noticeable performance increase, even on a lightly loaded SBS,
when you go from 1 to 2 GB. Not so with 2 to 3. I won't bother again (or
until the need for real metrics comes around).

I've used and not used the /3gb switch for servers with 1 GB or more of ram.
There was some confusion early on, but I believe that the consensus is now
firmly *do not use the switch on sbs, regardless of how much ram is in the
box*. (keeping in mind, I don't have any SBS with more than 3 GB, most are 1
or 2.) I really don't know if that would change if you had 4 GB.

So I have *no* servers with the /3gb switch anymore. But I'll say I never
recognized a problem either way.

Susan has a link to a discussion on the /3gb switch, more than anyone ever
wanted to know about it. (as in, sorry I brought the subject up).

-- 
Les Connor [SBS Community Member]
-------------------------------------
SBS Rocks !
"SuperGumby [SBS MVP]" <not@your.nellie> wrote in message 
news:%23qJb53LrEHA.896@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> before this gets outta hand.
>
> OK, one question neeeds changing.
> Have you hit the problems SOME people seem to when having more than 2GB 
> RAM?
>
> There's been a couple of threads started on performance issues. The 
> posters either were already or were advised to use /3GB and va switches 
> but this did not address the issue. In at least two cases removing RAM 
> down to 2GB seems to have resolved it.
>
> We have a few reasonably high use SBS's out there, we're not pushing user 
> count limits but loaded by either intensive use or the addition of third 
> party software on the SBS. In recent times we are advising the 
> installation of 2GB RAM but many are still at 1. There are no indications 
> that performance of these systems would be limited by RAM.
>
> I'm genuinely interested in the responses to the questions, and maybe a 
> couple of others.
>
> Do you run SBS on more than 2GB?
> Are you prepared to perform an experiment for me? Please reduce the RAM to 
> 2GB and monitor system performance, does either gut feel or statistical 
> data indicate a performance drop? (I sortta don't really expect anyone to 
> take me up on this. Unfortunately, due to Performance Tuning this may have 
> a long term effect on the system and may be impacted by the time the 
> server has been running the larger amount of RAM)
>
> There's a point of diminishing return. Also, in general I have found that 
> if more RAM is required very little benefit is gained by going from X to 
> 1.5X, the next logical step from 2GB is 4GB. Is the cost of the additional 
> RAM justified?
>
>
>
> "Les Connor" <les.connor@DEL.cfive.ca> wrote in message 
> news:epz0dYHrEHA.3488@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> I'm not aware of any problems with more than 2 GB ram - what have I 
>> missed ?
>>
>> I will say that I've not noticed much benefit from ram over 2 GB.
>>
>> -- 
>> Les Connor [SBS Community Member]
>> -------------------------------------
>> SBS Rocks !
>>
>>
>>
>> "Geoff Dutch" <Geoff Dutch@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
>> news:5358DECA-70FF-4777-917E-3CDAF0ACAE8F@microsoft.com...
>>> .... or so i thought until i was reading a post "What are your server's
>>> specs?" and "SuperGumby" replied :
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> "How many SBS's do you have with more than 2GB RAM? Have you hit the
>>> problems many people seem to when having more than 2GB RAM? Is there 
>>> some
>>> secret thing you do which allows these servers to operate nicely while 
>>> having
>>> more than 2GB RAM?"
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> So i've just ordered a server :
>>>
>>> PROLIANT ML370 XE-3.0G/533 2X36GB (15K) SCSI 2X512MB G3 x 1
>>> ML370/DL380 G3 XDP3060 DUAL PROCESSOR UPGRADE KIT x1
>>> 18.2GB PLUG ULTRA320 15K SCSI 2
>>> 36.4GB PLUG ULTRA320 15K SCSI 1
>>> SMART ARRAY 641 PCI-X CONTROLLER 1
>>> 2GB 266MHZ DDR PC2100 SDRAM 2
>>>
>>> Which will give me 4GB PC2100......... this HP stuff is seriously 
>>> expensive
>>> - have i made a major mistake?
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 


Relevant Pages

  • Re: 4GBs of RAM Miscount
    ... OS still shows RAM to 2.87 GB ... Most of my sites are <20 users and the only heavy SQL site is still on SBS ... have you ever applied the switch to a SBS 2003 box? ... increases the 'pointers' for memory handling to allow 32b systems to ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Virtualized SBS / WS /TS
    ... I don't expect any improvement in the USB support question any time soon. ... I chose this group again because the SBS is the main SW in this ... WS 2008 as Hyper-V parent with a couple of guest OS'es running, ... quickly takes 2.5 to 3 GB RAM for just the parent. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Virtualized SBS / WS /TS
    ... I chose this group again because the SBS is the main SW in ... server OS as children under Hyper-V and a minimal parent WS ... quickly takes 2.5 to 3 GB RAM for just the parent. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Best practice on virtualizing SBS
    ... Would the /3GB switch give me problems if I only have 3 GB of ram and not 4? ... If you do install a full HostOS, then make the HostOS a Standalone Server ... and install SBS with any other OS as Guests. ... At the moment my SBS is running on 1GB of ram, the host box will get 3GB ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Virtual Server on SBS
    ... SBS) won't be able to recognise it. ... can only use 4 GB of RAM. ... Since you're 2800 is running your SBS server, you are in 32 bit mode, ... So I'd need a device CAL for Virtual Server? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)