Re: Outgoing Email Filtering
amy_at_harborcomputerservices
Date: 10/01/04
- Next message: Paul Draper: "OptionalNames"
- Previous message: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]: "Re: RWW to office over the internet"
- In reply to: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Outgoing Email Filtering"
- Next in thread: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Outgoing Email Filtering"
- Reply: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Outgoing Email Filtering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:27:05 -0700
Marina,
Because if you send a virus to a business in California you are financially
liable for the damages that the company incurs. This legal stuff is spreading
out of California too. So you much be responsible for what you users send out.
Amy
"Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]" wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Outgoing attachments??? Why on earth would you want that?
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Marina
> Microsoft SBS-MVP
>
> "Brian" <bclynes@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht
> news:f31f9a61.0410010810.5cae8af3@posting.google.com...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking into the options for having outgoing email attachments
> > quarantined and reviewed before onward transmisson. The server is
> > standard SMB 2003 with Exchange. I know it could be done with ISA but,
> > is there any other way using my current config?
> >
> > Many thanks for your help,
> >
> > Brian
>
>
>
- Next message: Paul Draper: "OptionalNames"
- Previous message: Dave Nickason [SBS MVP]: "Re: RWW to office over the internet"
- In reply to: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Outgoing Email Filtering"
- Next in thread: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Outgoing Email Filtering"
- Reply: Marina Roos [SBS-MVP]: "Re: Outgoing Email Filtering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|