Re: Inexpensive, supported Fax?
From: Jeff L (***jeff_at_availabletech.net)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: frequncy of email send / receive"
- Previous message: Colby: "MSExchangeIS Mailbox MTA Error"
- In reply to: Jim G: "Inexpensive, supported Fax?"
- Next in thread: Jim G: "Re: Inexpensive, supported Fax?"
- Reply: Jim G: "Re: Inexpensive, supported Fax?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:56:56 -0400
Jim,
The Creative Modem blaster has treated me well although it is not signed.
Regards,
Jeff Loucks
Available Technology ®
Solutions For Professionals ®
www.availabletechnology.com
"Jim G" <jimg@home.com> wrote in message
news:0b5501c4a633$a1fc83c0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> I think I'd like to use the fax system included in
> SBS2003. What is the least expensive, yet supported,
> internal (PCI), or external Fax modem I can use? I
> checked the Server Hardware Catalog, Brooktrout, and
> several others.
>
> Alternatively, I could set up an XP Pro workstation with
> Symantec WinFax Pro 10 (because I have a license). But
> then I lose all the benefits of the shared fax, fax
> distribution, central storage, etc. On the other hand, I
> guess I gain a decent fax package.
>
> Jim G
> WriterTech LLC
- Next message: SuperGumby [SBS MVP]: "Re: frequncy of email send / receive"
- Previous message: Colby: "MSExchangeIS Mailbox MTA Error"
- In reply to: Jim G: "Inexpensive, supported Fax?"
- Next in thread: Jim G: "Re: Inexpensive, supported Fax?"
- Reply: Jim G: "Re: Inexpensive, supported Fax?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]