Re: Single NIC configuration with cable modem/router
From: Franz Leu (franz.leu._at_spam_removal.norfolk.ch)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: Yosemite Sam: "Re: Pulling out my last 2 hairs over routing and ICW"
- Previous message: Andy-L: "Re: Tape Changers"
- In reply to: Frank McCallister: "Re: Single NIC configuration with cable modem/router"
- Next in thread: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: Single NIC configuration with cable modem/router"
- Reply: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: Single NIC configuration with cable modem/router"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:02:44 +0200
The second nic is not what he was asking for, and he made his point
clear on his first response. btw: I have systems with the exact same
configuration and they run as perfect as the ones with 2 nics.
I agree that 2 nics are the better way to go. Anyhow, if 1 nic would be
an absolute "no way to go" like some of you always pray instead of
offering a idea to solve the actual problem, MS would not have this way
built in and well documented.
Franz
"Frank McCallister" <anonymous> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:epvINOWlEHA.644@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi
>
> $25 will save your boss a lot more money in peace of mind and hours
spent
> fixing problems!!
>
> Frank
> "JCerrone" <JCerrone@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:49C665A2-D654-429A-9D2E-EDF1D3241157@microsoft.com...
> >I have seen the recommendation to go with 2 NICs. On the other
hand, the
> > boss says 1 NIC is supposed to be a supported configurationand "I
> > shouldn't
> > need to spend more money!".
> >
> > "Frank McCallister" wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> You would be well served to put a second NIC in the server and set
it up
> >> as
> >> shown in http://www.smallbizserver.net/Default.aspx?tabid=52
(ignore the
> >> ISA
> >> parts if Standard) This will be a more secure and easier to setup
> >> network.
> >>
> >> Frank McCallister
> >> COMPUMAC
> >> "JCerrone" <JCerrone@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:7E9FB987-8416-4A26-80D6-9DF4AD2B3CE1@microsoft.com...
> >> >I have just installed a new SBS2003...previously, our small
network was
> >> >just
> >> > peer-to-peer with a workgroup. There is a single NIC in the
server.
> >> > The
> >> > connection to the WAN is through a router which acts as the
firewall.
> >> > Connection is provided by cable modem.
> >> >
> >> > Usually, I can see the internal LAN and get to the WAN.
Frequently,
> >> > though,
> >> > I seem to time out as IE will think it's working offline. My
internet
> >> > provide says their DNS servers are running fine. If if ping an
> >> > external
> >> > web
> >> > page, sometimes I get replies and sometimes I time out. I'm not
sure
> >> > where
> >> > to troubleshoot for this problem.
> >> >
> >> > The clients are configured to point to SBS2003 server as the DNS
> >> > server.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
- Next message: Yosemite Sam: "Re: Pulling out my last 2 hairs over routing and ICW"
- Previous message: Andy-L: "Re: Tape Changers"
- In reply to: Frank McCallister: "Re: Single NIC configuration with cable modem/router"
- Next in thread: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: Single NIC configuration with cable modem/router"
- Reply: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: Single NIC configuration with cable modem/router"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|