Re: http://companyweb

From: Peter Schott (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/13/04 

Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:11:59 -0700

Jeff,

The W98 client is up to date with all critical updates.
Also I just installed the update for Microsoft.NET
Framework v. 1.1. That did not do it. The IE v. is 6.
something.

See my correspondance with Marina for more...

Thx,

Peter S.
>-----Original Message-----
>Peter,
>
>Regarding Authentication probably the wrong track...
better put it back to
>original settings.
>
>Have you updated the clients machines using windows
update and do they have
>the .net framework installed? Given that companyweb
leverages the .net
>framework this could be a primary difference between
your XP clients and
>W98. You might also want to verify the IE version on w98
as I think
>Sharepoint requires 5.5 minimum.
>
>Any oddities discovered with those settings?
>
>Regards,
>Jeff Loucks
> Available Technology ®
> Solutions For Professionals ®
> www.availabletechnology.com
>
>
>
>"Peter Schott" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote in message
>news:556a01c480b5$fdfda170$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>It says "The page cannont be displayed." At the bottom
>of the screen it says "cannot find server or DNS error"
>
>Earlier I thought it might be an authentication problem,
>so I enabled anonymous access in IIS. That did not work.
>I just read the book more carefully, maybe I also have
>change the Anonymous Access Settings page at companyweb?
>
>Peter S.
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Peter,
>>
>>I have a feeling that it is realted to authentication.
>Does it say page not
>>found or you are not authorized?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Jeff Loucks
>> Available Technology ®
>> Solutions For Professionals ®
>> www.availabletechnology.com
>>
>>
>>"Peter Schott" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>wrote in message
>>news:527501c4808b$a2aeca30$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>>> Yes, the only DNS server listed is the internal IP
>>> address. No secondary DNS is listed.
>>>
>>> Peter S.
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >Peter,
>>> > Is the SBS system's internal IP address the only
>>> value listed for DNS
>>> >servers by the Windows 98 client? I've seen
>situations
>>> where
>>> >http://companyweb/ could not resolve when the clients
>>> had both a primary and
>>> >secondary DNS servers and for some reason were
>>> forwarding the request to the
>>> >secondary DNS which had no translation matrix for
>>> internal names like
>>> >companyweb.
>>> >--
>>> >Matt Clapham
>>> >Microsoft Corporation
>>> >
>>> >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,
>and
>>> confers no rights.
>>> >
>>> >"Peter Schott" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>>> wrote in message
>>> >news:4a9f01c4806d$1e4ba100$a301280a@phx.gbl...
>>> >> OK, my Windows 98 clients can't resolve companyweb
>to
>>> the
>>> >> internal IP address. If I run ipconfig /all on the
>>> >> client it shows the DNS Server as the correct
>internal
>>> IP
>>> >> address. Is this a Windows 98 problem? Is there
>way
>>> to
>>> >> resolve it short of upgrading my old clients?
>>> >>
>>> >> Thx.
>>> >>
>>> >> Peter S.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>-----Original Message-----
>>> >>>Hello Peter
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Make sure the clients are all pointing to the Small
>>> >> Business Server for
>>> >>>DNS. If they cannot resolve the name they will fail
>to
>>> >> connect. The best
>>> >>>way to determine this is with PING companyweb. Make
>>> sure
>>> >> it resolves to the
>>> >>>internal address of the Small Business Server
>computer.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Doug Boyd
>>> >>>
>>> >>>dboyd@online.Microsoft.com
>>> >>>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no
warranties,
>>> and
>>> >> confers no rights.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>.
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >.
>>> >
>>
>>
>>.
>>
>
>
>.
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: http://companyweb
    ... I am not using DHCP on my W98 clients. ... legacy from the configuration of our old NT 4.0 server ... It logged into the network ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: DevExpress & D8
    ... > desktop speed/performance or availability of third party components or a ... I also have done a fair bit of compact framework development with C# & ... > clients needs (issues such as availability of programmers for the ... EWF and IW are probably good, but they seem to be very much niche products. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: How do objects of C# classes handle backwards compatibility?
    ... I'm new in dealing with backward compatibility issues and want to make ... that have used previous releases of our framework do not need to ... is there any other way that clients of earlier versions ... Is there a reason to install a new version into an application without ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: run a solution
    ... The clients can also install the framework by going to the windowsupdate ... >>> Do I need the .net framework at client side in order to run the .net ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • How do objects of C# classes handle backwards compatibility?
    ... I'm new in dealing with backward compatibility issues and want to make ... The desired outcome is that clients ... that have used previous releases of our framework do not need to ... of public properties is not a prime number :-) ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)