Re: Repost: Jeff M's SBS 2003 Migration Process

From: Mark (nospam_at_nospam.nospam)
Date: 08/12/04


Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:01:14 +0930

Hi Jeff,

Thank you for taking the time to reply, and thanks for having the motivation
and perseverance to take on a task such as this document!

I look forward to it's release.

Best regards,

Mark

"Jeff Middleton [SBS-MVP]" <jeff@cfisolutions.com> wrote in message
news:u93$l$0fEHA.2536@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hello Mark,
>
> Thank you for your persistence in asking, and I apologize for not being
> forthcoming in clarifying this.
>
> The answer to your questions are:
>
> 1. No, I've not published or released a public summary of the upgrade
method
> I've written...yet. Very soon.
>
> 2. I'm pretty sure it is going to become available within the next month
in
> full discriptive format.
>
> 3. It's tentatively set to be included in a book which would be available
> within a few months from now. The dots on i and crosses on t are mostly
all
> that remains...and the production time.
>
> 4. I'm not being coy by not releasing more information yet. The situation
is
> still dynamic. Between the time I started this email and now, I've just
had
> another private conversation concerning this topic with folks at MS. In
> fact, I am very grateful that MS is looking at this for me, and that many
of
> the SBS MVPs are working production upgrades based upon the documentation
> I've written, and giving me feedback, corrections and tuning in the
process.
> I made revisions to the text as recently as yesterday based upon feedback
I
> got in the last few days.
>
> 5. I want to make this information available as soon as possible, but I'm
> also working with MS and other parties to ensure that the process is
> embraced and supported by MS as much as possible. I'm watching as 3-10
posts
> a day are asking about how to migrate an SBS, so I'm very much aware that
> people would like some options like this.
>
> For anyone arriving in the middle of this discussion, Mark is asking about
a
> method of upgrading an SBS domain that's based upon a process I've used
for
> about 3-4 yrs. It's not something I invented out of the blue, rather it's
a
> finesse of the issues that SBS provides in terms of licensing, technology
> and pragmatic domain management. You could figure out the broad process
from
> simply doing a google of stuff I've posted for the last 3 yrs on
migration.
> It's not a secret. It's a DC roles transfer out and back to an new SBS
> server. The challenge is in the details.
>
> Basically it's a method to introduce a new SBS server to an existing
domain
> that retains the original SBS server name, the domain name, the IP, and
the
> AD. It's a very transparent process. It's not hard to do, but it's very
> technical. It's a process that looks more like disaster recovery than an
> upgrade, but it has the number one advantage of being non-distruptive to
the
> production operations...it's done offline. It can also be done with an
open
> timeline. I've done upgrades that spanned weeks from start to finish
because
> that was convenient. I rebuilt my own domain from a 4 months old
> backup....just because I could confirm that it would work.
>
> This NG is where I will be releasing the earliest information on this
topic,
> so it's the place to keep watching.
>
> Mark, thanks again for your interest, and thank you to everyone for
> continuing patience.
>
>
> "Mark" <nospam@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
> news:%23cKhtTzfEHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Sorry for reposting, I didn't get a response to the original post. One
> last
> > try to see if anyone knows. :-)
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Has JM made a copy of his SBS 2003 migration documentation mentioned
below
> > publicly available yet?
> >
> > Or is it only going to be available in a book released some time in the
> (not
> > soon enough!) future?
> >
> > I'd find it an interesting read before I attempt to migrate our network,
> > even if the document is only at draft stage.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > "Jeff Middleton [SBS-MVP]" <jeff@cfisolutions.com> wrote in message
> > news:%23kb3BBeaEHA.1840@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >
> > >
> > > So, I guess that most useful direct contribution I can describe
pending
> is
> > > the documentation and scripting I've been working on. I've been
> perfecting
> > > and documenting a manner of doing SBS 2003 Migrations that I feel
> > > dramatically improves upon the MS documented method. I'm pretty sure
> that
> > at
> > > least 4-5 SBS MVPs have applied the theory if not the draft
> documentation
> > > method to successfully migrate production SBS 2000 servers.
> > >
> > > The migration process is most interesting because it accomplishes the
> task
> > > without losing the AD domain, without changing the SBS server name,
and
> by
> > > preserving and technically migrating just about 95% of the original
SBS
> > 2000
> > > (or 4.5) over to a new SBS 2003 that is based upon a clean install,
but
> > all
> > > the original AD and related technical configuration. If you are a
> > long-time
> > > reader in this NG and it's predecessors, you will recognize the method
> as
> > > one I've used personally for about 4 yrs, but it's on steroids now.
;-)
> > It
> > > makes it possible to accomplish a virtually transparent/replacement of
a
> > > production SBS without working nights or weekends, without taking the
> > > original SBS server down for the duration of the process, and without
> risk
> > > to the production domain as the process is worked. It's an offline
> upgrade
> > > that can span an open-ended amount of time, whatever you need to do
the
> > job
> > > right and with confidence. For instance, I just did a production SBS
for
> a
> > > customer that I started as I was finishing the first draft of the
> > migration
> > > documents, and along the way, discovered new things I wanted to
include
> in
> > > my documentation and method. As a result, the upgrade spanned a total
of
> 3
> > > weeks from when I started, to when I put the new SBS online. I should
> > > mention that the steps involed can be completed in about 5 hrs of
> straight
> > > work, however. The time I took was available to me because I wanted to
> > > refine the process, and I was building tools on the fly. But it's
> > > significant that the new server can just slide into place of the old
one
> > > with little complication, even if the offline process spans weeks.
> > >
> > > Another view on this as a solution. My own server suffered from a
> > electrical
> > > storm that damaged both drive volumes on separate disks in my server.
I
> > had
> > > CRC error everywhere across my Software registry, my BKF disaster
> recovery
> > > backup on the alternate drive, all four primary Exchange store files,
> plus
> > > at least 3 Exchange transaction log files. But strange circumstance,
the
> > > majority of the data files where unaffected. I decided to use the same
> > > migration process I had used on this server the first time I did it in
> > March
> > > this year. Using a 4 month old drive image, I migrated my old SBS 2000
> > > forward again to reconstruct the new SBS again from scratch but with
the
> > > same AD and details. I used a drive recovery tool to scrape the
Exchange
> > off
> > > the old drives intact. When I was done, I mounted my current Exchange
> (in
> > an
> > > "inconsistent" state due to the crash) on my clean server install
based
> > upon
> > > a 4 month old version of the AD. I actually ended up losing _nothing_.
> All
> > > my workstation profiles worked fine, my Exchange was fine, the data
> files
> > > were file, I brought forward my old shared folders and security
> settings.
> > > This was one of those "your mileage may vary" sort of events that
really
> > > demonstrated the worst case scenario of a migration/disaster recovery.
> The
> > > only loss I have is a pair of dead hard drives and a day of
> effort....and
> > > lots of documentation!
> > >
> > > At this point, it looks like it is going to be part of a couple of
> > chapters
> > > I'm writing will probably appear as chapters in a Harry Brelsford book
> > > coming out "soon". I'm hoping to have separate chapters on Migration
and
> > > Disaster Recovery. I hope to get at least some of this information out
> > > before the book publishes because there is so much demand for the
> > > information. I'm also working on scripting tools that relate to this,
as
> > > well as doing other common chores we SBS admins deal with all the
time.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Repost: Jeff Ms SBS 2003 Migration Process
    ... > Hello Mark, ... I've not published or released a public summary of the upgrade ... I'm not being coy by not releasing more information yet. ... > the SBS MVPs are working production upgrades based upon the documentation ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SBS2k3 upgrade
    ... Chad, Thanks for your response,greatly appreciated ... >Hi Mark - see inline ... >Chad A. Gross - SBS MVP ... >No. OEM will not upgrade a trial version to the full ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: SBS 2003 Premium SP1 Upgrade Story
    ... that's why I built a clean SBS with SP1. ... The server has now been rebuilt with a clean install of SBS 2003 Premium ... I may try an upgrade again tomorrow. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Transition Pack versions and availablilty
    ... It requires that you upgrade to SP2 for Exchange and SP2 for Sharepoint, both of which you should have already done. ... The good news is that once you're done, your existing SBS wizards, including RWW, will still work. ... Getting back to the original question; any experiences applying the transition pack, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: reaching the 50 user barrier on SBS 2000
    ... Upgrading to SBS2003 for 50 users would cost you: ... The migration pack alone costs more than that + you need to get migration ... Javier [SBS MVP] ... > upgrade to SBS2003 only to exceed the limits there in less than two years. ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)