Re: SCSI vs S-ATA
From: root (postmaster_at_buchanangc.com)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: Ricky Morris [MSFT]: "Re: RIS with two NICs"
- Previous message: Jerry Dubuke: "Re: SCSI vs S-ATA"
- In reply to: Mark Mancini: "Re: SCSI vs S-ATA"
- Next in thread: root: "Re: SCSI vs S-ATA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:15:03 -0700
"Mark Mancini" <info@NOSPAMmcse2000.com> wrote in message
news:%23Qu3eiYeEHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> my 2 cents....if Seagate has 5 year warranties on their SCSI drives
Seagate now has a 5 year warranty on ALL their HDs both [S]ATA and SCSI.
> and
> every BIG server manufacturer only offers S-ATA on low end
> server................I report, you decide.
That's easy. For modest configurations SATA is the clear choice.
- Next message: Ricky Morris [MSFT]: "Re: RIS with two NICs"
- Previous message: Jerry Dubuke: "Re: SCSI vs S-ATA"
- In reply to: Mark Mancini: "Re: SCSI vs S-ATA"
- Next in thread: root: "Re: SCSI vs S-ATA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|