Re: SCSI vs S-ATA
From: root (postmaster_at_buchanangc.com)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: Jimbo: "Re: Has *anyone* been able to get VPN working with Linksys BEFSR41 Router??"
- Previous message: Axel Larson: "Re: My Documents on laptops."
- In reply to: NickC: "SCSI vs S-ATA"
- Next in thread: Jack Kessler: "Re: SCSI vs S-ATA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:35:06 -0700
"NickC" <me@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:OQNVhXWeEHA.2812@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Proposed 10 user SBS network:
>
> Anyone know if the new SATA drives are reliable enough to use instead of
> SCSI (ultra 320)?
You bet. The WDC Raptor is the drive of choice with over 1,000,000 MTBF and
5 year warranty.
> I know that traditionally SCSI has always been prefered for the extra
> reliability but is that still the case?
Actually that has always been mostly a myth perpetrated to justify the fact
that SCSI HDs cost double.
> If SATA is just as reliable I might
> try a pair of them for the same cost asone SCSI.
Exactly.
- Next message: Jimbo: "Re: Has *anyone* been able to get VPN working with Linksys BEFSR41 Router??"
- Previous message: Axel Larson: "Re: My Documents on laptops."
- In reply to: NickC: "SCSI vs S-ATA"
- Next in thread: Jack Kessler: "Re: SCSI vs S-ATA"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
