Re: Multi nic question and WINS question w/sbs2003

From: Mark Mancini (info_at_NOSPAMmcse2000.com)
Date: 07/21/04 

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:50:41 -0400

your biz s/w may require WINS so I would leave it but if you have 2 external
connections then you need a hardware device to load balance it, you cannot
tie them both into SBS. 

-- 
Sincerely,
Mark Mancini, CCA, CCNA, Master CIW&CI, CNE 4&5, MCSE+I 4&2000
www.MCSE2000.com
www.AppLauncher.com
"Tester" <Test@testthis.org> wrote in message
news:10ft726kacd7uce@corp.supernews.com...
> how then do I segregate the DMZ hosts that are on a different Network
> (192.168.1.x vs the 192.168.0.x hosts)?
> How do I handle the 2 seperate sets of public IP's we have with our 2
> different internet connection lines (t1's from different providers and
> different IP's)?
>
>
> "CRIS HANNA (SBS-MVP)" <crishannanospam@computingpossibilities.net> wrote
in
> message news:OMMWAszbEHA.1132@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > since you are using win2k and xp...DNS should be all you need...as long
as
> > someone isnt vpning in with a win9x box
> >
> > as for NICs...two is all you want..one for internal, one for external,
> since
> > you are installing Premium you get ISA so you will have a software
> firewall
> >
> > -- 
> > Cris Hanna (SBS-MVP)
> > _____________________
> > Please only respond in the Newsgroup and not directly to me, so that
> > everyone can share the information
> > "Tester" <Test@testthis.org> wrote in message
> > news:10ft265gtegm16e@corp.supernews.com...
> > > I am getting ready to move to sbs2003 from nt4 domain, there will be
> only
> > > w2k and xp clients.  Can I get rid of WINS?  What are the drawbacks?
> > > advantages?  I have users who regularly browse the network for things
> they
> > > need, it is an old habbit.  Will they still be able to do this?
> > > I am planning on getting Premium 2003 and using it on multiple
> interfaces,
> > > external, internal, and dmz to get rid of a firewall.  Is this wise?
> Can
> > I
> > > put multiple nics on each interface (2 on each interface, 6 total) for
> > load
> > > balancing on each side of the box?
> > >
> > > the external will be connected to 2 t1s, the dms to 2 different
switches
> > in
> > > the 192.168.1.x range, and the trusted in the 192.168.0.x range.  does
> > > anyone see a problem here?
> > >
> > > thanks.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Disable XP Firewall
    ... > to disable my XP Firewall. ... Then, right-click on your Internet connection, choose Properties, go to ... *direct* Internet connections; enabling it on LAN connections is going ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Re: Firewall
    ... > I believe that it is Port 3 that it is using. ... >> cant view it because I am behind a firewall. ... >> on my internet connection highlights it, ... >> connections under network connections, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: What is the Pattern here ?
    ... These are all Dialup Connections that I had no connection with at the time. ... It's obviously an enormous security hole, ... > and a real firewall box. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Black Ice confesses faulty program!!!
    ... > outgoing connections or traffic except in cases where these connections ... > "dangerous/suspicious" traffic by the BlackICE program. ... > get into your machine then even a PC *without* a firewall is completely ... If you don't think "Spyware" is a problem for computer ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Port 135
    ... The patch doesn't disable DCOM / RPC, so connections can still be made. ... That's why you need a firewall. ... the patch is not the thing to control ... control over your TCP/IP ports and services, ...
    (microsoft.public.security)