SBS vs windows 2003 server
From: Andy Fish (ajfish_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 07/19/04
- Next message: Henry Craven: "Re: <<< Small Biz Server this week July 18th 2004 >>>"
- Previous message: foaman_at_hotmail.com: "SBS component Active directory configuration failed to install properly"
- Next in thread: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: SBS vs windows 2003 server"
- Reply: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: SBS vs windows 2003 server"
- Reply: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: SBS vs windows 2003 server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Jul 2004 09:26:26 -0700
Hello,
I am trying to procure a copy of windows 2003 server for hosting a
demonstration system. I have found that SBS 2003 is cheaper than
windows 2003 server standard edition which confuses me because I
thought it was a superset of it.
can someone help me with these simple questions:
1. Does SBS include a copy of windows 2003 server, or do I need to
already have windows server installed before I can install SBS?
2. can I just install part of SBS so I don't get all the stuff I don't
need?
3. can I install my own additional apps on SBS or will it only run the
included ones?
4. is there anything I can do with windows 2003 that I can't do with
SBS?
5. why is SBS cheaper than windows 2003 server?
Many Thanks
Andy
- Next message: Henry Craven: "Re: <<< Small Biz Server this week July 18th 2004 >>>"
- Previous message: foaman_at_hotmail.com: "SBS component Active directory configuration failed to install properly"
- Next in thread: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: SBS vs windows 2003 server"
- Reply: CRIS HANNA \(SBS-MVP\): "Re: SBS vs windows 2003 server"
- Reply: Javier Gomez [SBS MVP]: "Re: SBS vs windows 2003 server"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|