Re: SUS Server or not...

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP] (kweilbacMVP_at_gte.net)
Date: 07/10/04 

Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:30:56 -0400

Roger,

Microsoft has published a document on installing SUS in an SBS environment:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/sus/updatingsbswsus.mspx

Also, keep in mind that the Exchange purists are just that -- Exchange only.
They see SBS as breaking all the rules. That's why it is important to use
the built in wizards. Microsoft has also made some internal tweaks in
putting all of these apps under a single server - including tweaks for
Exchange.

There are many of us who are running SUS just fine on an SBS server. 

-- 
Kevin Weilbacher [SBS-MVP]
"The days pass by so quickly now, the nights are seldom long"
"Roger Wassner" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23QWLrOkZEHA.3692@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hello,
>
> people of exchange NGs said that installing SUS on a SBS (= with Exchange
> Server) could interference with OWA. Especially troubleshooting IF a error
> occurs is hard to do. A dedicated server is best for SUS. But it should
work
> on a server like SBS (= all functions on one host), too. But you should do
a
> test in a test environment before installing SUS on SBS (because you have
> only ONE productive SBS server in the real world) ;-)
>
> Just wanna said that.
>
> Regards
> Roger
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: So why SBS?
    ... Public folders will be in the next version.. ... The sad part of most of us is that we haven't even tried or practiced a backup/restore and we freak out over a 'single" SBS box when we haven't even tried to restore it from a harddrive. ... Exchange seems to mix its words and titles, the global/generic use of POP and SMTP for just about every Exchange function is dumb, MailEnable understands post office protocol and simple mail transfer protocol in a "meaningfull" way. ... The standard profiles in Server are quite effective assuming you add new users to the correct account in the first place and your note running more than 1 file server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Easy to use second 2000 Server for Exchange?
    ... Existing Exchange 2000 server - therefore have the CALs - so no new ones are ... Frank McCallister SBS MVP ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: So why SBS?
    ... Public folders will be in the next version.. ... If SBS isn't for you...that's fine. ... Mailenable is an example of a freeware or pay for extra's, mail server. ... It is infinitly simpler to configure than Exchange once installed. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Email for second domain
    ... The Microsoft Exchange MTA Stacks service is normally disabled on Exchange 2003 Servers on SBS 2003. ... You can safely ignore the MTA warning messages on the SBS 2003 server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • RE: Configuring exchange 2003 in SBS
    ... As I know, this is not related to per user mailbox, it refer to the mailbox ... store on the whole Exchange server. ... This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ... What minimum requirement if I want this server for a fileserver? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)